Cited by 132Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effects of exposure to a to-be-shocked environment upon the rat’s freezing response: Evidence for facilitation, latent inhibition, and perceptual learning

Kiernan, M. J., Westbrook, R. F.·1993·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B

Abstract

Three experiments used the freezing response of rats to examine the effects of pre-exposure to an environment upon (1) its associability with shock and (2) its discriminability from a second environment. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that freezing was proportional to the interval between exposure to the environment at time T1 and the occurrence of shock at T2. This function was shifted by pre-exposure to the to-be-shocked environment, with brief pre-exposures increasing (facilitation) and extended pre-exposures decreasing (latent inhibition) the impact of a given T1-T2 interval on freezing. Experiment 3 provided evidence that the facilitatory and latent inhibitory effects resulting from brief and extended exposures to the to-be-shocked environment were accompanied by an increase in discriminability. The results were taken to have supported the claim that pre-exposure changes associability as well as discriminability (Hall & Honey, 1989) and were discussed in terms of the model for perceptual learning proposed by McLaren, Kaye, and Mackintosh (1990).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640749308401089

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer context pre-exposure has a monotonic inhibitory effect on generalization across contexts.

    “longer context pre-exposure has a monotonic inhibitory effect on generalization across contexts.”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Kiernan and Westbrook, 1993

  • Longer pre-exposure to the training context leads to less responding in the test context, indicating the learned association is not generalized.

    “longer pre-exposure to the training context leads to less responding in the test context, indicating that the learned association is not generalized.”

    From Predictive Representations: Building Blocks of Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as Kiernan and Westbrook (1993)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiernan, M. J., & Westbrook, R. F.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
Published
1993-08
Volume
46
Issue
3b
Pages
271-288
ISSN
  • 0272-4995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-1321
OpenAlex
W2011279846
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
freezing response, pre-exposure, latent inhibition, facilitation, associative learning, discriminability, perceptual learning, rats, fear conditioning
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Electroshock, Immobilization, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review