Cited by 251Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Conjunctive representations, the hippocampus, and contextual fear conditioning

Open access
RUDY, J. W., O'REILLY, R. C.·2001·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The context in which events occur can be represented as both (1) a set of independent features, the feature representation view, and (2) a set of features bound into a unitary representation, the conjunction representation view. It is assumed that extrahippocampal (e.g., neocortical) areas provide a basis for feature representations, but the hippocampal formation makes an essential contribution to the automatic storage of conjunctive representations. We develop this dual-representation view and explore its implications for hippocampal contributions to contextual fear conditioning processes. To this end, we discuss how our framework can resolve some of the conflicts in the recent literature relating the hippocampus to contextual fear conditioning. We also present new data supporting the role of a key mechanism afforded by conjunctive representations--pattern completion (the ability of a subset of a memory pattern to activate the complete memory)--in contextual fear conditioning. As is implied by this mechanism, we report that fear can be conditioned to the memory representation of a context that is not actually present at the time of shock. Moreover, this result is predicted by our computational model of cortical and hippocampal function. We suggest that pattern completion demonstrated in animals and by our model provides a mechanistic bridge to human declarative memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.1.1.66

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RUDY, J. W., & O'REILLY, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
RUDY, J. W.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
66-82
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2165303994
Cited by
247
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061316, R01 MH61316-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
conjunctive representations, feature representation, hippocampus, contextual fear conditioning, pattern completion, hippocampal formation, memory storage, computational model of memory, declarative memory, contextual fear
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Association Learning, Attention, Conditioning, Classical, Hippocampus, Mental Recall, Social Environment, Long-Term Potentiation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review