Cited by 150Memory and Neural MechanismsBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceChild and Animal Learning Development

Exploring a latent cause theory of classical conditioning

Open access
Gershman, Samuel J., Niv, Yael·2012·Learning & Behavior

Abstract

We frame behavior in classical conditioning experiments as the product of normative statistical inference. According to this theory, animals learn an internal model of their environment from experience. The basic building blocks of this internal model are latent causes-explanatory constructs inferred by the animal that partition observations into coherent clusters. Generalization of conditioned responding from one cue to another arises from the animal's inference that the cues were generated by the same latent cause. Through a wide range of simulations, we demonstrate where the theory succeeds and where it fails as a general account of classical conditioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13420-012-0080-8

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When prediction errors are large, the present hidden cause is treated as obsolete, and another cause-new or previously stored-must be selected.

    “Large prediction errors signal that the current latent cause is no longer relevant (i.e., the situation has changed) and a new or stored latent cause should be inferred.”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Latent cause inference theory proposes that individuals store many statistical models of the world and determine which unseen cause best explains what they currently sense.

    “According to a recent theory of latent cause inference, people build up a library of statistical models of their environment, and then infer which is the hidden, or “latent,” cause of their current sensory observations [43–46].”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans). Lon- don, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Gershman, Samuel J.
Venue
Learning & Behavior
Published
2012-08-29
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
255-268
ISSN
  • 1543-4494 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-4508
OpenAlex
W2155479528
Cited by
149
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
classical conditioning, animal learning, Bayesian inference
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Classical, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review