Cited by 22Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Employees' reactions to an interactive website assessing alcohol use and risk for alcohol dependence, stress level and coping

WESTRUP, DARRAH, FUTA, KRISTINE T, WHITSELL, SHELLY D, MUSSMAN, LISA, WANAT, STANLEY F, KOOPMAN, CHERYL, WINZELBERG, ANDY, MATANO, ROBERT·2003·Journal of Substance Use

Abstract

Objective We assessed employee's reactions to using a website‐based intervention designed to identify moderate and high‐risk drinkers and to reduce their problematic drinking.Methods One hundred and eighty‐seven participants completed a prewebsite‐intervention survey, website intervention, and a follow‐up survey assessing participants' reactions to the website. The website provided feedback regarding participants' alcohol use, risk of lifetime or current alcohol dependence, stress level, and coping style. Participants identified as at ‘low’ or ‘moderate’ risk for alcohol‐related problems were randomly assigned to receive either ‘limited individualized feedback’ or ‘full individualized feedback’. High‐risk participants were given the full individualized feedback intervention.Results Twenty‐three per cent were identified to be at high risk of having alcohol‐related problems, and 17% were at moderate risk. Most participants viewed the site information as interesting and easy to use. High‐risk participants were more interested in alcohol‐related information than were other participants. Eight per cent of the respondents reported a change in their drinking with this brief intervention.Conclusion These findings demonstrate the potential of the Internet to attract and engage persons who are high‐ or moderate‐risk for alcohol‐related problems in learning more about their risk as well as about their stress and their strategies for coping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1465989031000109789

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WESTRUP, D., FUTA, K. T., WHITSELL, S. D., MUSSMAN, L., WANAT, S. F., KOOPMAN, C., WINZELBERG, A., & MATANO, R.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
WESTRUP, DARRAH
Venue
Journal of Substance Use
Published
2003-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
104-111
ISSN
  • 1465-9891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-9942
OpenAlex
W2018963341
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Substance Use (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence risk, online intervention, employee health, personalized feedback, stress, coping strategies, problematic drinking, brief intervention, risk assessment, user engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review