Cited by 240Workplace Health and Well-beingDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The impact of digital health interventions on health-related outcomes in the workplace: A systematic review

Open access
Howarth, Ana, Quesada, Jose, Silva, Jessica, Judycki, Stephanie, Mills, Peter R·2018·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Background: The impact of employee health on productivity in the workplace is generally evidenced through absenteeism and presenteeism. Multicomponent worksite health programmes, with significant online elements, have gained in popularity over the last two decades, due in part to their scalability and low cost of implementation. However, little is known about the impact of digital-only interventions on health-related outcomes in employee groups. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the impact of pure digital health interventions in the workplace on health-related outcomes. Methods: Multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and PsycINFO, were used to review the literature using PRISMA guidelines. Results: Of 1345 records screened, 22 randomized controlled trial studies were found to be eligible. Although there was a high level of heterogeneity across these studies, significant improvements were found for a broad range of outcomes such as sleep, mental health, sedentary behaviours and physical activity levels. Standardized measures were not always used to quantify intervention impact. All but one study resulted in at least one significantly improved health-related outcome, but attrition rates ranged widely, suggesting sustaining engagement was an issue. Risk of bias assessment was low for one-third of the studies and unclear for the remaining ones. Conclusions: This review found modest evidence that digital-only interventions have a positive impact on health-related outcomes in the workplace. High heterogeneity impacted the ability to confirm what interventions might work best for which health outcomes, although less complex health outcomes appeared to be more likely to be impacted. A focus on engagement along with the use of standardized measures and reporting of active intervention components would be helpful in future evaluations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2055207618770861

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings align with previous research on digital health interventions.

    “These findings align with previous research39,40, underscoring the potential for digital tools in managing chronic conditions and providing a foundation for future innovations in this field.”

    From Impact of digital health interventions on glycemic control and weight management. (2025) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say workplace digital health interventions show promise for improving employee health, supporting the general alignment with previous research and potential for digital tools. The review does not establish their effectiveness for managing chronic conditions specifically; its Discussion cautions that purely digital interventions may be inadequate for more complex health issues. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [24]Higgins JP Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. In: Higgins JP Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008, pp. 1– 649.
  2. [48]Cook RF Billings DW Hersch RK Back AS Hendrickson A A field test of a web-based workplace health promotion program to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2007; 9(2): 1– 8. PMC1913939 17581811
  3. [49]Cook RF Hersch RK Schlossberg D Leaf SL A Web-based health promotion program for older workers: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(3): 1– 12. PMC4390614 25830503

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howarth, A., Quesada, J., Silva, J., Judycki, S., & Mills, P. R.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Cigna (United States) (US)
  • Cigna, Global Well-being Solutions Ltd, UK
  • Whittington Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Howarth, Ana
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2018-01
Volume
4
Pages
2055207618770861-2055207618770861
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800263550
Cited by
240
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
digital health interventions, workplace health, employee health, absenteeism, presenteeism, sleep, mental health, sedentary behavior, physical activity, user engagement, attrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review