Cited by 70Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

A pilot study of an interactive web site in the workplace for reducing alcohol consumption

Matano, Robert A., Koopman, Cheryl, Wanat, Stanley F., Winzelberg, Andrew J., Whitsell, Shelly D., Westrup, Darrah, Futa, Kristine, Clayton, Justin B. +2 more·2007·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

An interactive web-site-based intervention for reducing alcohol consumption was pilot tested. Participants were 145 employees of a work site in the Silicon Valley region of California, categorized as low or moderate risk for alcohol problems. All participants were given access to a web site that provided feedback on their levels of stress and use of coping strategies. Participants randomized to the full individualized feedback condition also received individualized feedback about their risk for alcohol-related problems. Some evidence was found for greater alcohol reduction among participants who received full individualized feedback, although due to difficulties in recruiting participants, the sample size was inadequate for evaluating treatment effects on drinking. The results provide preliminary support for using an interactive web site to provide individualized feedback for persons at risk for alcohol problems. However, the low participation rate (2.7%) suggests that such an intervention must address the challenges of recruiting employees through their work site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.020

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 3-month follow-up, there was a significant decrease of heavy drinking episodes for those receiving complete feedback, both for low and moderate risk individuals.

    “3-month follow-up: significant ↓ of heavy drinking episodes for those receiving complete feedback, both for low and moderate risk individuals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matano, R. A., Koopman, C., Wanat, S. F., Winzelberg, A. J., Whitsell, S. D., Westrup, D., Futa, K., Clayton, J. B., Mussman, L., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Koopman, Cheryl
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
71-80
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002356795
Cited by
70
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (5 U1K SPO8101-02)
  • Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol consumption reduction, online intervention, workplace health promotion, personalized feedback, stress, coping strategies, alcohol-related problems, personnel selection, participation rates
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Demography, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, User-Computer Interface, Workplace, Risk Assessment, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review