The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment
Abstract
A web‐based learning system has been developed to facilitate question‐posing, peer‐assessing, item‐viewing and drill‐and‐practice learning activities. In this paper, the pedagogical basis underlying the design and development of the system is explained in the light of information‐processing theory, social construction of knowledge theory and social modelling theory. A preliminary study to evaluate the instructional potential of the system has been conducted; this has also identified the factors that influence students’ use of the system. Results taken from questionnaires and open‐ended questions revealed that by enabling students to play various roles such as composers, critics and adapters, the system was perceived as a cognition‐enhancing and motivational learning tool by the participants. Data analysis further indicated that various factors worked together to influence the performance of question‐posing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Classification schemes for questions are presented in [134] while asking students to generate questions themselves for improving meta-cognitive abilities has been discussed in [135].”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
Principles of Instructional Design
Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974) · Cited by 4,467
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137 · Cited by 2,740
Language and Thought of the Child
Piaget, J. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203992739 · Cited by 2,662
The Systematic Design of Instruction
Chang, S. L. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9606-0 · Cited by 2,633
The Language and Thought of the Child
Weber, C. O., Piaget, J., & Warden, M. (1927) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415214 · Cited by 2,335
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332
Instructional Design Theories and Models
(1983) · doi:10.4324/9780203824283 · Cited by 2,192 · cited 1×
“In addition to helping learners consolidate knowledge better and longer, cognitivists believe that such processing techniques can help cognitive structuring or re-construction (Wittrock, 1978; Reigeluth, 1983).”
BackgroundBandura, A. (2008) · The International Encyclopedia of Communication · doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs053 · Cited by 1,902
(1985) · Cited by 1,625
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Balajthy E., 1984, Journal of Reading, 27, 408
- Bicanich E., 1997, Journal of Technological Horizons in Education, 25, 61
- Hung M. H., 2001, The effects of subtitles and captions on foreign language learning
- Malone T. W., 1987, Aptitude, learning, and instruction (vol. 3 Cognitive and affective process analyses), 223
- Slavin R., 1992, Interaction in cooperative groups, 145
- Zhang J., 2001, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 33
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536
Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning
Chang, K., Wu, L.-J., Weng, S.-E., & Sung, Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.002 · Cited by 255
PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions
Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008) · Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/1404520.1404526 · Cited by 211
Chang, S., Hsu, T., & Jong, M. S. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103758 · Cited by 212
Mulla, N., & Gharpure, P. (2023) · Progress in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s13748-023-00295-9 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, F., Liu, Y., & Chan, T.
- Affiliations
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- National Chi Nan University (TW)
- National Central University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Fu‐Yun
- ORCID
- Yu, Fu‐Yun
- Venue
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-348
- ISSN
- 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-3300
- OpenAlex
- W2089942811
- Semantic Scholar
- c7ca5fe07e27dc57046151390e1380c956569bec
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- web-based learning system, question posing, peer assessment, drill and practice, information processing theory, social construction of knowledge, student motivation, student role, cognitive enhancement, instructional design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
