The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A web‐based learning system for question‐posing and peer assessment
Abstract
A web‐based learning system has been developed to facilitate question‐posing, peer‐assessing, item‐viewing and drill‐and‐practice learning activities. In this paper, the pedagogical basis underlying the design and development of the system is explained in the light of information‐processing theory, social construction of knowledge theory and social modelling theory. A preliminary study to evaluate the instructional potential of the system has been conducted; this has also identified the factors that influence students’ use of the system. Results taken from questionnaires and open‐ended questions revealed that by enabling students to play various roles such as composers, critics and adapters, the system was perceived as a cognition‐enhancing and motivational learning tool by the participants. Data analysis further indicated that various factors worked together to influence the performance of question‐posing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Classification schemes for questions are presented in [134] while asking students to generate questions themselves for improving meta-cognitive abilities has been discussed in [135].”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
Principles of Instructional Design
Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974) · Cited by 4,467
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137 · Cited by 2,740
Language and Thought of the Child
Piaget, J. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203992739 · Cited by 2,662
The Systematic Design of Instruction
Chang, S. L. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9606-0 · Cited by 2,633
The Language and Thought of the Child
Weber, C. O., Piaget, J., & Warden, M. (1927) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415214 · Cited by 2,335
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332
Instructional Design Theories and Models
(1983) · doi:10.4324/9780203824283 · Cited by 2,192 · cited 1×
“In addition to helping learners consolidate knowledge better and longer, cognitivists believe that such processing techniques can help cognitive structuring or re-construction (Wittrock, 1978; Reigeluth, 1983).”
BackgroundBandura, A. (2008) · The International Encyclopedia of Communication · doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs053 · Cited by 1,902
(1985) · Cited by 1,625
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Balajthy E., 1984, Journal of Reading, 27, 408
- Bicanich E., 1997, Journal of Technological Horizons in Education, 25, 61
- Hung M. H., 2001, The effects of subtitles and captions on foreign language learning
- Malone T. W., 1987, Aptitude, learning, and instruction (vol. 3 Cognitive and affective process analyses), 223
- Slavin R., 1992, Interaction in cooperative groups, 145
- Zhang J., 2001, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 33
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536
Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning
Chang, K., Wu, L.-J., Weng, S.-E., & Sung, Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.002 · Cited by 255
PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions
Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008) · Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/1404520.1404526 · Cited by 211
Chang, S., Hsu, T., & Jong, M. S. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103758 · Cited by 212
Mulla, N., & Gharpure, P. (2023) · Progress in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s13748-023-00295-9 · Cited by 132
The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions
Denny, P. C., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Hamer, J. (2008) · doi:10.5555/1379249.1379255 · Cited by 112
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011 · Cited by 78
Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0 · Cited by 105
Bottomley, S., & Denny, P. (2011) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.20526 · Cited by 102
Yu, F. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.002 · Cited by 86
Self-citationYu, F., & Liu, Y. (2009) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00905.x · Cited by 81
Self-citationBuckner, E. S., & Kim, P. (2013) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7 · Cited by 78
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2015) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.001 · Cited by 64
Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes
Yu, F. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.025 · Cited by 65
Self-citationPredictive Effects of Online Peer Feedback Types on Performance Quality
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2013) · Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) · Cited by 63
Self-citationMedical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study
Grainger, R., Dai, W., Osborne, E., & Kenwright, D. N. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1 · Cited by 69
Hwang, G., Zou, D., & Lin, J. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103815 · Cited by 59
Automatic Question Generation for Educational Applications – The State of Art
Le, N.-T., Kojiri, T., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2014) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06569-4_24 · Cited by 64
Development of a mobile learning system based on a collaborative problem-posing strategy
Sung, H., Hwang, G., & Chang, Y.-C. (2013) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.867889 · Cited by 66
Student use of the PeerWise system
Denny, P. C., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Hamer, J. (2008) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/1384271.1384293 · Cited by 53
Yu, F.-Y., & Wu, C.-P. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.012 · Cited by 50
Self-citationExperimental study of learning support through examples in mathematical problem posing
Kojima, K., Miwa, K., & Matsui, T. (2015) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1007/s41039-015-0001-5 · Cited by 52
Ye, X., Chang, Y.-H., & Lai, C. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1495651 · Cited by 52
Ercan, O. (2014) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/14.13.608 · Cited by 46
Understanding the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment: A Path Model
Lu, J.-Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.3.f · Cited by 45
Hung, P., Hwang, G., Lee, Y.-H., Tsung‐Hsun, W., Vogel, B., Milrad, M., & Johansson, E. (2014) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 45
Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018 · Cited by 48
Evaluating the Quality of Learning Resources: A Learnersourcing Approach
Abdi, S., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Demartini, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2021.3058644 · Cited by 40
Haake, J. M., & Pfister, H. (2010) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9083-7 · Cited by 39
Yu, F., Tsai, H.-C., & Wu, H.-L. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.197 · Cited by 37
Self-citationSupporting and structuring “contributing student pedagogy” in Computer Science curricula
Falkner, K. E. K., & Falkner, N. (2012) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2012.727713 · Cited by 35
Walkington, C., & Hayata, C. (2017) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0842-z · Cited by 43
Evaluation and improvement of student's question-posing ability in a web-based learning environment
Lan, Y.-F., & Lin, M. P.-C. (2011) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.939 · Cited by 37
Assessing peer support and usability of blogging in hybrid learning environments
Chang, Y., & Chang, Y. S. (2011) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.619889 · Cited by 33
Smith, D. H., Hao, Q., Dennen, V. P., Tsikerdekis, M., Barnes, B., Martin, L., & Tresham, N. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00200-7 · Cited by 31
The Effects of Problem Posing Learning Model on Students’ Learning Achievement and Motivation
Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020) · Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) · doi:10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.9981 · Cited by 29
Triplet Structure Model of Arithmetical Word Problems for Learning by Problem-Posing
Hirashima, T., Yamamoto, S., & Hayashi, Y. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07863-2_5 · Cited by 28
Student-Generated Questions to Assess Learning in an Online Orientation to Pharmacy Course
Pittenger, A. L., & Lounsbery, J. L. (2011) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe75594 · Cited by 30
Hwang, G., Huang, H., Wang, R., & Zhu, L. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13007 · Cited by 30
Peer Generation of Multiple-Choice Questions: Student Engagement and Experiences
Rhind, S. M., & Pettigrew, G. W. (2012) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme.0512-043r · Cited by 28
Student use of the PeerWise system
Denny, P. C., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Hamer, J. (2008) · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1597849.1384293 · Cited by 24
Kalmpourtzis, G. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-7393-y · Cited by 26
The Effects of Student Question-Generation with Online Prompts on Learning
Yu, F. Y., & Pan, K. J. (2014) · Cited by 23
Self-citationInterest-Driven Creator Theory: case study of embodiment in an experimental school in Taiwan
Looi, C., Wong, S. L., Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Shih, J.-L., Chang, B., Wu, Y., Liu, C., Yeh, C. Y. C., Chen, Z., et al. (2022) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2023.18023 · Cited by 21
Self-citationAre There Any Joint Effects of Online Student Question Generation and Cooperative Learning?
Yu, F.-Y., Wu, C. P., & Hung, C.-C. (2013) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0112-y · Cited by 21
Self-citationChang, C., & Chang, C. (2014) · The EuroCALL Review · doi:10.4995/eurocall.2014.3636 · Cited by 20
Denny, P. C., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. C. (2008) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/1595356.1595378 · Cited by 20
Comparison of the Quality of Written Scientific Arguments in Different Laboratory Environments
Kapıcı, H. Ö., Akçay, H., & Koca, E. E. (2021) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10147-w · Cited by 19
(2016) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 18
Yu, F., & Wu, C. P. (2012) · Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) · doi:10.3966/2073753x2012125704005 · Cited by 18
Self-citationANÁLISIS DE LAS INVESTIGACIONES SOBRE FEEDBACK: APORTES PARA SU MEJORA EN EL MARCO DEL EEES
Cano, E. (2014) · Bordón. Revista de pedagogía · doi:10.13042/bordon.2014.66402 · Cited by 16
Exploring the impact of role-playing on peer feedback in an online case-based learning activity
Ching, Y. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1765 · Cited by 21
Utami, I. Q., & Hwang, W. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-021-00209-5 · Cited by 20
Kojima, K., Miwa, K., & Matsui, T. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/jai-130035 · Cited by 18
The impact of question generation activities on performance
Luxton-Reilly, A., Bertinshaw, D., Denny, P. C., Plimmer, B., & Sheehan, R. (2012) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/2157136.2157250 · Cited by 17
Using Online Concept Mapping with Peer Learning to Enhance Concept Application
Chang, S. L., & Chang, Y. (2008) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-02-2008-0002 · Cited by 17
Lahza, H. F., Demartini, G., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105260 · Cited by 16
Bishay, P. L. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22281 · Cited by 16
Integrating worked examples into problem posing in a web-based learning environment
Hsiao, J. Y., Hung, C.-L., Lan, Y.-F., & Jeng, Y. C. (2013) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 16
Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension
Yeh, H.-C., & Lai, P.-Y. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.794 · Cited by 15
Boon, S. (2016) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2014.901984 · Cited by 13
A Learning Support System based on Question-posing and Its Evaluation
Hirai, Y., & Hazeyama, A. (2007) · International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (C5) · doi:10.1109/c5.2007.2 · Cited by 15
Lan, Y.-F., Lin, M. P.-C., & Hung, C.-L. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.47.2.a · Cited by 14
Chang, S.-B., Huang, H.-M., Tung, K.-J., & Chan, T.-W. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1149293.1149297 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAssessing Peer Support and Usability of Blogging Technology
Chang, Y., Chang, Y.-S., & Chen, C. (2008) · doi:10.1109/iccit.2008.93 · Cited by 13
Supporting student-generated free-response questions
Luxton-Reilly, A., Denny, P. C., Plimmer, B., & Bertinshaw, D. (2011) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/1999747.1999792 · Cited by 12
Chin, P. (2016) · New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences · doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i3.410 · Cited by 12
Social Microlearning Motivates Learners to Pursue Higher-Level Cognitive Objectives
Göschlberger, B. (2016) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49625-2_24 · Cited by 12
What you think and what I think: Studying intersubjectivity in knowledge artifacts evaluation
Babik, D., Singh, R., Zhao, X., & Ford, E. W. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9586-x · Cited by 13
Leelamma, S., & Indira, U. D. (2017) · Journal of Education and Learning · doi:10.5539/jel.v6n3p107 · Cited by 12
Concerto II: A Learning Community Support System Based on Question-posing
Hazeyama, A., & Hirai, Y. (2007) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2007.101 · Cited by 11
Using peer review to develop professional competencies: an Ubuntu perspective
Barac, K., Kirstein, M., & Kunz, R. (2021) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2021.1942089 · Cited by 11
Any Effects of Different Levels of Online User Identity Revelation?
Yu, F. Y. (2012) · Cited by 10
Self-citationSarid, M., & Peled, Y. (2010) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/1320 · Cited by 10
The Impact of Peerwise Approach on the Academic Performance of Medical Students
Kadir, F. A., Ansari, R. M., Manan, N. A., Abdullah, M. H. N., & Nor, H. M. (2014) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2014.2.4.50 · Cited by 10
Luxton-Reilly, A., Plimmer, B., & Sheehan, R. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1832838.1832849 · Cited by 10
Yu, F., & Kuo, C. (2022) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2119448 · Cited by 9
Self-citationTHE TYPES, FREQUENCY AND QUALITY OF ELEMENTARY PUPILS' QUESTIONS IN AN ONLINE ENVIRONMENT
Hu, H. W., & Chiou, G. (2012) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 9
Burhanuddin, B., & Arrafii, M. A. (2022) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-022-09806-0 · Cited by 9
Yu, F. (2005) · International Conference on Computers in Education · Cited by 9
Self-citationBoon, S. (2015) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.856930 · Cited by 9
To See or Not to See: Effects of Online Access to Peer-Generated Questions on Performance
Yu, F. Y. (2013) · Cited by 9
Self-citationDesign and Evaluation of Question-Generated Programming Learning System
Lai, C.-H., Tho, P.-D., & Liang, J.-S. (2017) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiai-aai.2017.107 · Cited by 8
Bartlett, A. D., Pace, J., Arora, A., & Penm, J. H.-D. (2022) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy11010005 · Cited by 12
PeerWise - The Marmite of Veterinary Student Learning
Sykes, A., Denny, P. C., & Nicolson, L. (2011) · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · Cited by 8
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2016) · Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) · Cited by 8
Self-citationConnecting Learning in Higher Education to Students' Career and Personal Interests
Darwin, T. K., Walkington, C., & Pruitt-Britton, T. (2022) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3819-0.ch009 · Cited by 7
Preliminary Evaluation of a Problem-posing Method in Programming Classes
Kunimune, H., & Niimura, M. (2014) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.162 · Cited by 7
Denny, P. C., Hanks, B., Simon, B., & Bagley, S. (2011) · ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) · doi:10.1145/2016911.2016924 · Cited by 7
Efectos de los tipos de feedback entre iguales en los trabajos escritos
Cano, E., Seguí, L. P., & Fernández-Ferrer, M. (2022) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v26i1.13929 · Cited by 9
Yu, F., & Cheng, W.-W. (2022) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-022-00190-2 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPan, A.-J., Chou, P., & Lai, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2023.3296443 · Cited by 6
A Peer-Assessment Criteria Development Approach to Improving Critical Thinking of Students
Lai, C., & Hwang, G. J. (2014) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiai-aai.2014.80 · Cited by 6
Nicholas, M., McKenzie, S., & Wells, M. (2016) · Journal of Education and Learning · doi:10.5539/jel.v6n1p267 · Cited by 6
Games as Skins for Online Tests
Ramani, S., Sirigiri, V., Panigrahi, N. L., & Sabharwal, S. (2008) · IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL) · doi:10.1109/digitel.2008.12 · Cited by 6
Students’ Questions in Higher Education Chemistry Classes According to their Gender
Martinho, M., Almeida, P. A., & Teixeira-Dias, J. J. C. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.744 · Cited by 5
Chin, P. (2007) · New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences · doi:10.11120/ndir.2007.00030013 · Cited by 5
Social Micro-Learning and Student Performance
Göschlberger, B., Dopler, F., & Kotsis, G. (2022) · International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) · doi:10.1109/iceta57911.2022.9974766 · Cited by 4
A Systematic Review of Online Peer Assessment Tools for Learning Evaluation
Butarbutar, R., Sauhenda, A. F., & Marnina, M. (2025) · Innovare Journal of Education · doi:10.22159/ijoe.2025v13i2.53640 · Cited by 4
Tower of Questions: Gamified Testing to Engage Students in Peer Evaluation.
Kiron, N., & Vassileva, J. (2018) · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, F., Liu, Y., & Chan, T.
- Affiliations
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- National Chi Nan University (TW)
- National Central University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Fu‐Yun
- ORCID
- Yu, Fu‐Yun
- Venue
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-348
- ISSN
- 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-3300
- OpenAlex
- W2089942811
- Semantic Scholar
- c7ca5fe07e27dc57046151390e1380c956569bec
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- web-based learning system, question posing, peer assessment, drill and practice, information processing theory, social construction of knowledge, student motivation, student role, cognitive enhancement, instructional design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review