Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning
Open accessAbstract
This study compared the effects of worked example and scripting on students’ argumentative peer feedback, essay and learning qualities. Participants were 80 BSc students who were randomly divided over 40 dyads and assigned to two experimental conditions (worked example and scripting). An online peer feedback environment named EduTech was designed and students were tasked with writing an argumentative essay, engaging in peer feedback, and revising their essay. The results indicate that students in the scripting condition benefited more than students in the worked example condition regarding peer feedback quality. Furthermore, the scores of students in both conditions improved from pre-test to post-test in terms of argumentative essay writing and learning. This difference was significant, however, between the two conditions only with regard to argumentative essay writing favoring the scripting condition. We explain how each of these approaches can be used to improve students’ argumentative peer feedback and essay writing and learning.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In other words, peer feedback not only leads to improvement of students’writing proficiency, but also helps them develop discipline-specific knowledge (Liu & Carless, 2006), enhance their understandings on the topic (Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Liu & Carless, 2006).”
BackgroundToulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101 · see citing works
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 6,887 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scientific research has shown that worked examples can facilitate problem solving processes (Kirschner et al., 2006) and the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge (Kyun et al., 2013) by reducing extraneous cognitive load which in turn lead to better learning outcomes (Sweller et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_446 · Cited by 5,538 · see citing works
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. S. (1979) · Cited by 923 · see citing works
The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education
Falchikov, N. (2001) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Constructivist instruction : success or failure?
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009) · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
National Research Council (2003) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/10858 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
European Journal of Psychology of Education
(2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/10212.1878-5174 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
Wingate, U. (2011) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing
King, A. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213600 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
The Worked-Out Examples Principle in Multimedia Learning
Renkl, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.016 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Measuring Knowledge to Optimize Cognitive Load Factors During Instruction.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom.
Carroll, W. M. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.360 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Krawczyk, D. C. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809285-9.00001-6 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationRelations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationNoroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationHsia, L.-H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004 · Cited by 170 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(e.g. Huisman et al., 2018), domain-specific learning (e.g. Latifi et al., 2019; Noroozi, Hatami, et al., 2018; Valero Haro et al., 2019), motivation (e.g. Hsia et al., 2016), self-efficacy (e.g. Hsia et al., 2016), and argumentative essay writing (Latifi et al., 2019; Valero Haro et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay
Hyland, K. (1990) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368829002100105 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Computer-Mediated Argumentative Interactions for the Co-Elaboration of Scientific Notions
Baker, M. J. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7_3 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Davies, P. (2000) · Innovations in Education and Training International · doi:10.1080/135580000750052955 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process
Baker, K. M. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416654794 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationTeaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment
Bacha, N. N. (2010) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog‐mediated peer feedback
Novakovich, J. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12114 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Lin, G.-Y. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 · Cited by 111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, a variety of approaches have been suggested to support students when they engage in peer feedback (see Lin, 2018; Noroozi et al., 2016; Valero Haro et al., 2019).”
BackgroundWood, N. V. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationBarriers to online critical discourse
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9007-3 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance
Mei, W. S. (2006) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688206071316 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments
Leitão, S. (2003) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088303257507 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course
Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. (2008) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510701794050 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Bayerlein, L. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.870531 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Argumentation in Higher Education: Improving Practice Through Theory and Research
Andrews, R. (2009) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Reid, J. M. (1982) · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.823930 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Providing and receiving anonymous feedback are considered to actively engage students in the peer feedback processes and activities (Nicol et al., 2014), reduces bias in the feedback process and provide more objective feedback (Raes et al., 2015).”
BackgroundKollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment
Chen, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703290802646297 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Effect of Worked Examples When Learning to Write Essays in English Literature
Kyun, S., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.727884 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, K.-H., Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2014) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.649766 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Using multisource feedback in the classroom: a computer-based approach
McGourty, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/13.848062 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Argumentation in higher education: improving practice through theory and research
Hyslop-Margison, E. J. (2011) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.582754 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Rethinking the Argumentative Essay
Schneer, D. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.123 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.450 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Internet-Based Peer Assessment in High School Settings
Tsai, C. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-120-9.ch046 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Teaching of social software and web 2.0
Chiazzese, G., & Chifari, A. (2012) · Italian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.17471/2499-4324/199 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
About Argument: Teaching and Learning Argument
Andrews, R. (1995) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Beissembayeva, G. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.508 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.755914 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationOnline peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationNoroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babaee, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationNoroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J. A., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T. W., & Verbaan, C.-L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11683-y · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationDarmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting
Noroozi, O., Alqassab, M., Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., & Panadero, E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2345669 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education
Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2081209 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education
Noroozi, O. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationSarı, E., & Han, T. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13004 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Darmawansah, D., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104516 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationAdelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2310976 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Exploring EFL students’ prompt engineering in human–AI story writing: an activity theory perspective
Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2361381 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script
Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Using scaffolded feedforward and peer feedback to improve problem-based learning in large classes
Rodríguez, M. F., Nussbaum, M., Yunis, L., Reyes, T. H., Alvares, D., Joublan, J. P., & Navarrete, P. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104446 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Bayat, M., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2155602 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationPan, F., Zhu, G., Sui, W., & Fu, M. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101404 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Wu, C., Zhang, Y.-W., & Li, A. W. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The synergistic effects in an AI-supported online scientific argumentation learning environment
Lin, Y., & Hung, C. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105251 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationShao, J., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Li, K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2251040 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Bahari, A., & Gholami, L. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2065308 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Clorion, F. D. D., Alieto, E. O., Fuentes, J. O., Suicano, D. J. B., Natividad, E.-R. R., Miñoza, M. V., Pil, A. I. O., Aidil-Karanain, F., & Vallejo, R. G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_16 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_16 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effect of STEM Practices on Teaching Speaking Skills in Language Lessons
Seitenova, S. S., Khassanova, I., Khabiyeva, D., Kazetova, A., Madenova, L., & Yerbolat, B. (2023) · International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology · doi:10.46328/ijemst.3060 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Effect of Project-Based Learning in Visual Arts Lesson on Lesson Outcomes and Attitudes
Özkan, Z. C. (2023) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.565 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Cheng, X., Gao, L. X., & Liu, Y. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103375 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Farrokhnia, M., Noroozi, O., Baggen, Y., Biemans, H. J. A., & Weinberger, A. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105229 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationAI assistance in peer feedback provision: Pedagogically sound, but minimally adopted
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105591 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationKuo, H., Chang, C., Wang, J.-P., Wu, E. L., & Li, P. (2024) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101513 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Abdallah, A. K., Aljanahi, M. H., & Almejalli, H. A. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch016 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Wang, J., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101442 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Noroozi, O. (2020) · European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies · doi:10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3279 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationCano, J. S. (2022) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.369 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Integrating Different Group Patterns into Collaborative Argumentative Writing in the Shimo Platform
Su, F., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2022) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-022-09632-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
van Ginkel, S. O., & Sichterman, B. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group's collaborative argumentation
Ouyang, F., Tang, Z., Cheng, M., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101227 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationXie, Q., & Chang, Z. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105167 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Yan, D. “., Jia, C., & Tian, F. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2491620 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Banihashem, S. K., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2517617 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationShulgina, G., Fanguy, M., Zhang, H., Courtney, M. G. R., Baldwin, M., & Costley, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tsai, P.-S. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2046108 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhang, E., Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Han, S., & Xue, Z. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13583 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Examining the use of ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing: A Mixed Methods Study
Annamalai, N., Uthayakumaran, A., Bervell, B., & Kumar, R. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x251333859 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Digital peer feedback on visual ideas: a study of eighth-grade students in visual art
Forslind, E.-L., Hrastinski, S., & Forsler, I. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2164785 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Costley, J., Courtney, M. G. R., Shulgina, G., & Fanguy, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13032-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Peer Tutoring and Math Digital Tools: A Promising Combination in Middle School
Miravet, L. M., Alegre, F., & Valentín, G. L. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10132360 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ask your peer! How requests for peer feedback affect peer feedback responses
van Blankenstein, F. V., Dirkx, K., & de Bruycker, N. M. F. (2024) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2024.2376832 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Vasset, F. P., Dahl, B. M., Thunem, G., & Frilund, M. L. (2023) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100759 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Keeping balance between loyalty and modification: a Toulminian model as analytical framework
Liu, D., & Xiong, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03151-w · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Toulmin Model Analysis of Student Argumentation on Artificial Intelligence
Turós, M., Kenyeres, A. Z., Balla, G., Gazdag, E., Szabó, E., & Szűts, Z. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091226 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mustika, M., Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Liao, C.-Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70006 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Thematic Analysis of Factors Influencing Student’s Peer-Feedback Orientation
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_12 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Forslind, E.-L., Hrastinski, S., & Forsler, I. (2025) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-025-09527-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
(2021) · doi:10.37546/jaltsig.call2020 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Enhancing coherence and student engagement through portfolio assignments and peer-feedback
Oestergaard, L. G., Hansen, J. S., Ravn, M. B., & Maribo, T. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00260-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Support Student Integration of Multiple Peer Feedback on Research Writing in Thesis Circles
Hsiao, Y. P., & Rajagopal, K. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bulut, M., & Kırbaş, A. (2022) · International Journal of Technology in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijtes.427 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Trusov, S. V. (2025) · Вестник Майкопского государственного технологического университета · doi:10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-2-99-110 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yuan, S., Huang, H., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2589405 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Xu, C., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16030335 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Harnessing the power of education for social change
Diko, M. (2023) · EUREKA Social and Humanities · doi:10.21303/2504-5571.2023.003051 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Role of Conjunctions and Students’ Cognitive Characteristics in Argumentative Essay Writing
Sobari, T., Mulyadi, Y., Wikanengsih, W., & Mustika, I. (2024) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.3.6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Prayogi, A., Mulyati, Y., Sastromiharjo, A., & Damaianti, V. S. (2022) · Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.18844/cjes.v17i12.8227 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
SCAFFOLDING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYWRITING: AN ONLINE SCRIPTED PEER FEEDBACK AND PEER FEEDFORWARD MODULE
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Education and new developments · doi:10.36315/2023v2end013 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationNirwanto, R., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., & Wulyani, A. N. (2024) · Journal on English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7824 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Innovative Approaches to Revolutionize Student-Centered Learning in the 21st Century
Salendab, F. A., & Tago, K. L. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yan, D. “., & Gao, Y. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2569352 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lin, Y.-R., & Jiao, X. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102044 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2613722 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Coding Framework for Analyzing the Types and Levels of Peer Feedback
Lee, S., & Ha, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418083 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chen, L., & Yan, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijmhci.405411 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liu, S., Xu, M., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00740-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Jansen, T., Bahr, J. L., Schaller, N.-J., Höft, L., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102969 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2022) · International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing · doi:10.1109/besc57393.2022.9995109 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Starting with the Self: A Pathway to Reimagining the Essay
Kent, C. R. (2022) · The English Journal · doi:10.58680/ej202231567 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Embedding Prompts to Facilitate Small Groups’ Computer-Supported Collaborative Concept Mapping
Ouyang, F., & Zheng, L. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2233124 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Arslan, K., Akçay, H., & Kapıcı, H. Ö. (2023) · International Journal on Social and Education Sciences · doi:10.46328/ijonses.434 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Peer feedback modelling needs in online higher education: An exploratory study
Henderikx, M., Vrieling, E., Molin, F., & Nadolski, R. J. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101464 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Navigating Academic Writing: EFL Students Teachers’ Challenges and Solutions
Nawangsih, N., Fajaryani, N., & Abrar, M. (2024) · Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran · doi:10.19109/6gkfyw37 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
He, H., Said, N., & Peter, J. (2026) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2026.101028
Shimo-based collaborative argumentative writing: Do grouping patterns matter?
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00087
Cheong, C. M., Zhu, X., & Lu, Q. (2025) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311251346498
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Yang, J., & Pi, Z. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5573626
CS Teaching Assistant Perceptions on LLM-Generated Faded Worked Examples for Feedback Training
Gonzaga, J. T., Vassar, A., & Jiang, Y. (2026) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772582
Svellingen, A. H. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06928-3
Trusov, S. V. (2026) · Вестник Майкопского государственного технологического университета · doi:10.47370/2078-1024-2026-18-1-158-168
Students’ perspectives on writing an argumentative essay in an academic literacy module
Bharuthram, S. (2026) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.4102/rw.v17i1.571
AI-assisted vibe coding with Base44: Creating personalized tools for argumentative writing
Pan, M., Li, K., & Lai, C. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101076
Investigating students’ engagement with GenAI-supported peer feedback generation in EFL writing
Guo, K., Li, D., Pan, M., & Lai, C. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2679729
Zhang, E., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Li, J., & Liu, H. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70288
Zhang, Y., Chen, L., & Chen, X. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102338
- Authors
- Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E.
- Affiliations
- Kharazmi University (IR)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Noroozi, Omid
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 655-669
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W3046276216
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- worked examples, scripting, argumentative essay writing, online peer feedback, essay revision, argumentation, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
