Cited by 41Outdoor and Experiential EducationRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementYouth Development and Social Support

Outdoor adventures and adolescents’ mental health: daily screen time as a moderator of changes

Mutz, Michael, Müller, Johannes, Göring, Arne·2019·Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning

Abstract

Research provided ample evidence that excessive screen time (ST) in adolescence has detrimental effects on psychosocial health. This paper argues that structured outdoor programs can serve as an antidote to negative health impacts of exaggerated ST. For youth with a high level of regular ST, outdoor adventures imply a break with their ‘normal’ (mediatized) lifestyle, so that greater progress in mental health can potentially arise. This hypothesis is tested in a sample of adolescents, who took part in a 10-day outdoor program. Pre-to-post program mean comparisons for stress, hedonic balance and life satisfaction show significant positive changes. However, benefits of the program are markedly greater among youths with a high level of daily ST compared to youths with low-to-moderate levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14729679.2018.1507830

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The psychological benefits gained from an outdoor adventure program were moderated by adolescents' typical daily screen time, with larger effect sizes for high ST users, suggesting they may have reaped greater benefits.

    “The study found that the psychological benefits gained from the outdoor adventure program were moderated by adolescents’ reported level of typical daily screen time (high (>3 hours/day) or low/moderate (≤3 hours/day)). Participation in the outdoor adventure program resulted in improved mental health across a range of measures for both low/moderate and high ST users but effect sizes were larger for”
  • Fourteen studies identified in this systematic scoping review measured both ST and GT.

    “Fourteen studies identified in this systematic scoping review measured both ST and GT [234–238, 242–250].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutz, M., Müller, J., & Göring, A.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Mutz, Michael
Venue
Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning
Published
2018-08-23
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
56-66
ISSN
  • 1472-9679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0402
OpenAlex
W2888555990
Cited by
41
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Outdoor and Experiential Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
screen time, adolescents, mental health, outdoor programs, outdoor adventure, stress, life satisfaction, moderation, media use, nature-based interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review