Cited by 1,416Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Long-term effects of Aβ42 immunisation in Alzheimer's disease: follow-up of a randomised, placebo-controlled phase I trial

Holmes, Clive, Boche, Delphine, Wilkinson, David, Yadegarfar, Ghasem, Hopkins, Vivienne, Bayer, Anthony, Jones, Roy W, Bullock, Roger +4 more·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Immunisation of patients with Alzheimer's disease with full-length amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta(42)) can clear amyloid plaques from the brain. Our aim was to assess the relation between Abeta(42) immune response, degree of plaque removal, and long-term clinical outcomes.Methods In June, 2003, consent for long-term clinical follow-up, post-mortem neuropathological examination, or both, was sought from 80 patients (or their carers) who had entered a phase I randomised, placebo-controlled trial of immunisation with Abeta(42) (AN1792, Elan Pharmaceuticals) in September, 2000. The follow-up study was completed in September, 2006. Plaques were assessed in terms of the percentage area of the cortex with Abeta immunostaining (Abeta load) and in terms of characteristic histological features reflecting plaque removal. Survival of all 80 individuals until severe dementia or death was assessed with a Cox proportional hazard model.Findings 20 participants--15 in the AN1792 group, five in the placebo group--died before follow-up started. A further 22 patients--19 in the AN1792 group, three in the placebo group--died during follow-up. Nine of the deceased patients, all in the AN1792 group, had given consent for post-mortem analysis; one of these who did not die with Alzheimer's disease was excluded. In the remaining eight participants who received immunisation and who were examined neuropathologically, mean Abeta load was lower than in an unimmunised control group that was matched for age at death (2.1% [SE 0.7] in treated participants vs 5.1% [0.9] in controls; mean difference 3.0%, 95% CI 0.6-5.4; p=0.02). Although there was considerable variation in Abeta load and degree of plaque removal among immunised participants, the degree of plaque removal varied significantly with mean antibody response attained during the treatment study period (Kruskal-Wallis p=0.02). Seven of the eight immunised patients who underwent post-mortem assessment, including those with virtually complete plaque removal, had severe end stage dementia before death. In the whole cohort, there was no evidence of improved survival (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.43-3.11; p=0.86) or of an improvement in the time to severe dementia (1.18, 0.45-3.11; p=0.73) in the AN1792 group versus the placebo group.Interpretation Although immunisation with Abeta(42) resulted in clearance of amyloid plaques in patients with Alzheimer's disease, this clearance did not prevent progressive neurodegeneration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61075-2

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study involving cognitively healthy adults showed that amyloid-beta in cerebrospinal fluid or the hippocampus increases after sleep deprivation or slow-wave sleep disruption.

    “A study involving cognitively healthy adults showed that Aβ in CSF or the hippocampus increases after sleep deprivation or slow-wave sleep disruption, which indicates the complexity of Aβ kinetics [59, 60, 61].”

    From Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease (2020) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Treatment will need to begin during the preclinical phase to prevent or limit plaque accumulation to be beneficial in reducing the risk of developing AD.

    “Several anti-Aβ therapeutic strategies are being pursued to treat AD; however, it is likely that treatment will need to begin during the preclinical phase to prevent or limit plaque accumulation to be beneficial in reducing the risk of developing AD (51, 52).”
  • Recent clinical trials attempting to replicate benefits of Aβ immunotherapy seen in mouse models have been primarily unsuccessful in preventing early cognitive decline in AD patients despite significantly decreasing amyloid burden.

    “Recent clinical trials attempting to replicate the benefits of Aβ immunotherapy seen in mouse models have been primarily unsuccessful in preventing early cognitive decline in AD patients despite significantly decreasing the amyloid burden”
  • Subsequent clinical analyses of the Aβ vaccine trial were at best unimpressive.

    “While safety concerns caused this trial to terminate prematurely, subsequent clinical analyses were at best unimpressive [250, 251].”
  • Anti-Aβ immunotherapy in individuals with mid- to late-stage clinical AD partially cleared AβPs, but this clearance did not seem to mitigate NFT formation or the inexorable disease course.

    “There have been cases in which individuals with mid- to late-stage clinical AD were administered anti-Aβ immunotherapy that partially cleared AβPs, but this clearance did not seem to mitigate NFT formation or the inexorable disease course (69-71).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, C., Boche, D., Wilkinson, D., Yadegarfar, G., Hopkins, V., Bayer, A., Jones, R. W., Bullock, R., Love, S., Neal, J. W., Zotova, E., & Nicoll, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Moorgreen Hospital (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Royal United Hospital (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Wales (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
372
Issue
9634
Pages
216-223
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2152446053
Cited by
1,416
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 120
FWCI
102.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, dental plaque removal, amyloid load, long-term clinical outcomes, survival, dementia progression, postmortem neuropathology, immunotherapy safety and efficacy, autopsy
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Antibody Formation, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review