Cited by 71Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma

Schlafer, Danielle, Shah, Katherine S., Panjic, Elyse Hall, Lonial, Sagar·2016·Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma and are a backbone of therapy. Bortezomib, the first PI approved, has shown efficacy in both front-line and relapsed/refractory settings however the development of resistance and side effects such as peripheral neuropathy can limit its use. The second generation PIs carfilzomib and ixazomib, both approved in relapsed/refractory cases, may help to overcome resistance mechanisms and increase tolerability. While bortezomib is approved to be administered intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC) and carfilzomib IV, ixazomib is the first and only approved PI that is orally bioavailable. Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects. A summary of efficacy data from select clinical trials is also included. Expert commentary: Targeting the proteasome/ubiquitin system is a validated and important part of current anti-myeloma therapy. The availability of an oral proteasome inhibitor without significant neuropathy as a side effect offers patients an important step forward over their treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14740338.2017.1259310

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlafer, D., Shah, K. S., Panjic, E. H., & Lonial, S.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Lonial, Sagar
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-764X
OpenAlex
W2556048177
Cited by
71
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
proteasome inhibitors, multiple myeloma, bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, drug safety, adverse effects management, peripheral neuropathy, drug resistance, oral bioavailability, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ubiquitin-proteasome system
MeSH terms
Bortezomib, Antineoplastic Agents, Boron Compounds, Glycine, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Oligopeptides, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review