Cited by 63Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionMedia Influence and HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Predicting proximal health responses to reminders of death: The influence of coping style and health optimism

Arndt, Jamie, Routledge, Clay, Goldenberg, Jamie L.·2006·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Research derived from terror management theory (TMT) suggests that conscious contemplations of mortality instigate efforts to remove such threatening cognitions from focal attention. Though efforts to manage death concerns in focal attention can positively affect one's health (e.g., engaging in health conscious behavior), such efforts can also negatively affect one's health (e.g., denying vulnerability to disease). The current research explores how individual differences in coping style and health optimism relate to the ways in which people respond to death-related cognitions in focal attention. Study 1 found that adaptive coping was associated with increased health behavioral intentions immediately after death thoughts were made salient (i.e., when death thoughts were still in focal attention) but not after a delay. Study 2 found that immediately after death thoughts were made salient, health optimism was associated with increased disease-detecting behavioral intentions relating to breast cancer. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14768320500537662

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent TMT-health studies, if proximal threats are paired with proximal, positive, vulnerability reducing incentives, some people chose healthier behaviors.

    “Yet, in recent TMT-health studies, if proximal threats are paired with proximal, positive, vulnerability reducing incentives, some people chose healthier behaviors (e.g., quitting smoking); it is important to consider mediating variables in TMT research (Arndt et al., 2006).”
  • Beneficial effects of conscious death thoughts on healthy behaviors are particularly evident among individuals who believe their own actions can have a positive impact on their health.

    “The beneficial effects of conscious death thoughts on healthy behaviors are particularly evident when healthy behaviors are aimed specifically at reducing the risk of death [31] and among individuals who believe that their own actions can have a positive impact on their health [31,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arndt, J., Routledge, C., & Goldenberg, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Arndt, Jamie
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2006-10
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
593-614
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2016738353
Cited by
63
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, death awareness, coping styles, adaptive coping, health behavior intentions, breast cancer screening, mortality salience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review