Cited by 124Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionCOVID-19 and Mental HealthSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The contagion of mortality: A terror management health model for pandemics

Open access
Courtney, Emily P., Goldenberg, Jamie L., Boyd, Patrick·2020·British Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The novel coronavirus, COVID‐19, proliferates as a contagious psychological threat just like the physical disease itself. Due to the growing death toll and constant coverage this pandemic gets, it is likely to activate mortality awareness, to greater or lesser extents, depending on a variety of situational factors. Using terror management theory and the terror management health model, we outline reactions to the pandemic that consist of proximal defences aimed at reducing perceived vulnerability to (as well as denial of) the threat, and distal defences bound by ideological frameworks from which symbolic meaning can be derived. We provide predictions and recommendations for shifting reactions to this pandemic towards behaviours that decrease, rather than increase, the spread of the virus. We conclude by considering the benefits of shifting towards collective mindsets to more effectively combat COVID‐19 and to better prepare for the next inevitable pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjso.12392

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMT suggests that death anxiety increases with the threat source, including COVID-19.

    “TMT suggests that death anxiety will increase with the threat source, including that of COVID-19 (Courtney et al., 2020).”

    From Understanding terror states of online users in the context of COVID-19: An application of Terror Management Theory (2021) · cites this paper as Courtney et al., 2020

    The paper’s opening section says COVID-19 provokes fear, and its opening summary predicts that the pandemic is likely to activate mortality awareness. It qualifies that prediction as varying with situational factors; it does not specifically predict that death anxiety will increase with the threat source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There has been no large-scale test of TMT applicability in the COVID-19 context using available data.

    “However, although various conceptual models and discussions based on TMT have been proposed during the COVID-19 era (e.g. see Courtney et al., 2020), there has been no large-scale test of the applicability of TMT in this context using available data.”
  • Psychological changes can disrupt physical and mental balance and predispose to autoimmune diseases, which can adversely affect cancer treatment, recovery, and social stability.

    “Winters (2022) also suggested that psychological changes lead to a disruption of one’s physical and mental balance and predisposition to autoimmune diseases, which can have adverse effects on cancer treatment, recovery, and social stability (Grossman et al., 2018; Courtney et al., 2020).”

    From Differences in proximal and intimacy-related defense mechanisms among patients with cancer in different psychological stages of dying (2024) · cites this paper as Courtney et al., 2020

    The paper’s discussion of cancer concerns mortality reminders and health behaviours, while its pandemic model concerns psychological responses to COVID-19. Searches for autoimmune disease, disrupted physical and mental balance, and effects on cancer treatment, recovery, or social stability found no passage addressing the claimed chain of effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]12. Columbia Global Centers (2020). Conservatism and Authoritarianism in Brazil: Histories, Politics, and Cultures. Symposium presented at the Ilias and Unicamp Conference, Columbia University, New York City, USA.
  2. [24]24. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. [49]49. Sole, J. W. (2007). Terror management and pandemic influenza: Social perception and response [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Lakehead University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Courtney, E. P., Goldenberg, J. L., & Boyd, P.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Courtney, Emily P.
Venue
British Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
607-617
ISSN
  • 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8309
OpenAlex
W3035864377
Cited by
124
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 8
FWCI
26.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
terror management theory, COVID-19 pandemic, death awareness, psychological threat, ideological frameworks, symbolic meaning, collective mindset, pandemic preparedness, public health behavior
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Defense Mechanisms, Denial, Psychological, Fear, Health Promotion, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Self Concept, Coronavirus Infections, Risk Reduction Behavior, Health Communication, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review