CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 182Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does habit strength moderate the intention–behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption

Open access
De Bruijn, Gert-Jan, Kremers, Stef P. J., De Vet, EmEly, De Nooijer, Jascha, Van Mechelen, Willem, Brug, Johannes·2007·Psychology & Health
DOI 10.1080/14768320601176113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present study examined if habit strength moderated the influence of intention on fruit consumption in a Dutch adult sample (N = 521, 46.3% males, mean age = 34.50, SD = 10.87), using the theoretical relations of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). TPB variables and habit strength were assessed at baseline. Fruit consumption was assessed with a validated questionnaire five weeks later. Three groups were created: low habit strength (n = 180), medium habit strength (n = 185) and high habit strength (n = 156). Confirmatory factor analyses and multi-group path analyses were performed using AMOS 4.0. A good fit was obtained for the overall measurement model and the structural models. Multi-group path analyses showed that intention was a significant predictor of fruit consumption in the low habit (β = 0.36, p < 0.001) and medium habit group (β = 0.30, p < 0.001), but a non-significant predictor in the high habit group (β = 0.05, p = 0.596). Implications for information-based and motivation-based interventions are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14768320601176113

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Conner M, 1996, Predicting Health Behaviour, 121
  3. Eagly A, 1993, The psychology of attitudes
  4. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599 · DOI
  5. Kremers SPJ, 2005, Environmental determinants and interventions for physical activity, nutrition and smoking:A review, 282
  6. 1998, Zo eet Nederland [This is how the Dutch eat]
  7. Nunnally JC, 1994, Psychometric Theory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–182 of 182

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
De Bruijn, G.-J., Kremers, S. P. J., De Vet, E., De Nooijer, J., Van Mechelen, W., & Brug, J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Psychology & Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-12
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
899-916
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
DOI
10.1080/14768320601176113
OpenAlex
W1984859871
Cited by
182
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Keywords
habit strength, theory of planned behavior, intention-behavior relationship, fruit consumption, moderation, dietary behaviour, health behavior change, information-based interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review