Cited by 78Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMedia Influence and Health

Saturated fat consumption and the Theory of Planned Behaviour: Exploring additive and interactive effects of habit strength

de Bruijn, Gert-Jan, Kroeze, Willemieke, Oenema, Anke, Brug, Johannes·2008·Appetite

Abstract

The additive and interactive effects of habit strength in the explanation of saturated fat intake were explored within the framework of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Cross-sectional data were gathered in a Dutch adult sample (n=764) using self-administered questionnaires and analyzed using hierarchical regression analyses and simple slope analyses. Results showed that habit strength was a significant correlate of fat intake (beta=-0.11) and significantly increased the amount of explained variance in fat intake (R(2-change)=0.01). Furthermore, based on a significant interaction effect (beta=0.11), simple slope analyses revealed that intention was a significant correlate of fat intake for low levels (beta=-0.29) and medium levels (beta=-0.19) of habit strength, but a weaker and non-significant correlate for high levels (beta=-0.07) of habit strength. Higher habit strength may thus make limiting fat intake a non-intentional behaviour. Implications for information and motivation-based interventions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.012

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruijn, G.-J., Kroeze, W., Oenema, A., & Brug, J.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
318-323
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058140559
Cited by
78
References
53
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
saturated fat intake, habit strength, theory of planned behavior, intention, dietary behaviour, additive and interactive effects, dietary intake, nutrition interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Netherlands, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Patient Education as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review