Cited by 33Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCritical Race Theory in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“I Never Think about My Race”: Psychological Features of White Racial Identities

Dottolo, Andrea L., Stewart, Abigail J.·2013·Qualitative Research in Psychology

Abstract

This study examines the ways that middle-aged white adults in a midwestern city talk about their own racial identity. Because race is a social identity that is so often viewed as “belonging” to people of color, this study assesses the ways that white participants responded to interview questions that asked specifically about racial identity. Twenty-three interviews were conducted with white graduates of the same high school in the Midwest when they were in their 50s. Qualitative analyses yielded codes that indicated denying any white racial identity or not understanding the question, experiencing white privilege, witnessing white privilege, and white guilt. Many expressions of white privilege were accompanied by ambivalence and anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14780887.2011.586449

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Blee KM, 1991, Women of the Klan: racism and gender in the 1920s
  2. 10.1111/0735-2751.00041 · DOI
  3. Brodkin K, 2004, Off white: readings on power, privilege, and resistance, 17
  4. Cross WE, 1971, Black World, 20, 13
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/019027250707000409 · DOI
  7. Dyer R, 1997, White
  8. Ezekiel RS, 1995, The racist mind: portraits of Neo-Nazis and Klansmen
  9. 10.4324/9780203361047_chapter_4 · DOI
  10. Fine M, 2004, Off white: readings on power, privilege, and resistance
  11. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621 · DOI
  12. Gregory S, 1996, Race
  13. Helms JE, 1990, Black and White racial identity: theory, research, and practice, 67
  14. Hurtado A, 2004, Off white: readings on power, privilege, and resistance, 315
  15. Ignatiev N, 1995, How the Irish became white
  16. Iyer A, 2004, Off white: readings on power, privilege, and resistance, 345
  17. Jacobson MF, 1998, Whiteness of a different color: European immigrants and the alchemy of race
  18. Kipnis D, 1976, The powerholders
  19. Koonz C, 2003, The Nazi conscience
  20. Lakoff R, 1975, Language and woman's place
  21. 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00237.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1177/0146167292183006 · DOI · Paper page
  23. McIntosh P, 1989, Peace and Freedom, 10
  24. McIntosh P, 2001, Feminist frontiers V, 29
  25. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009 · DOI
  26. Meroe AS, 2007, Affirmative development: cultivating academic ability, 95
  27. Moon D, 1999, Whiteness: the communication of social identity, 177
  28. Nenga SK, 2003, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 167
  29. Omi M, 1994, Racial formation in the United States
  30. Ostrander S, 1984, Women of the upper class
  31. 10.1215/9780822383659 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/074355489272003 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1177/0146167204271713 · DOI
  34. Roediger DR, 1991, The wages of whiteness: race and the making of the American working class
  35. Roediger DR, 2006, The Chronicle of Higher Education, B6
  36. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Steedman CK, 1986, Landscape for a good woman: a story of two lives
  38. 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.761 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0146167299025004008 · DOI
  41. Tatum BD, 1994, Teachers College Record, 95, 462, 10.1177/016146819409500412 · DOI
  42. Van den Berg H, 2003, Analyzing race talk: multidisciplinary approaches to the interview
  43. 10.1177/0957926593004002006 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Winant H, 2004, Off white: readings on power, privilege, and resistance, 3
  45. Winter DG, 1996, Personality: analysis and interpretation of lives

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dottolo, A. L., & Stewart, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Dottolo, Andrea L.
Venue
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Published
2012-11-19
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
102-117
ISSN
  • 1478-0887 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-0895
OpenAlex
W1825604627
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Research in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • University of Michigan
  • Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
white identity, white privilege, white guilt, ambivalence, anxiety, social identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review