Cited by 9Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Monsters don’t bother me anymore’ forensic mental health service users’ experiences of acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis

Davies, Bronwen E., Morgan, Sara, John-Evans, Hannah, Deere, Ellie·2019·The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for psychosis (ACTp) is an approach that aims to change the relationship an individual with psychosis has with difficult thoughts, emotions and experiences. It promotes the use of acceptance, defusion, mindfulness and focussing on valued outcomes as opposed to struggling with psychotic experiences. This service evaluation project explored service users’ experiences and meanings of ACTp within a medium secure mental health service. Thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews with 10 male service users. Four main themes emerged from the data: ‘Recovery’, ‘Insight’, ‘Developing Skills’ and ‘Accessibility’. Overall, service users viewed their experience of ACTp positively and identified encouraging therapeutic outcomes. These findings suggest that ACTp is an approach that should be considered a therapeutic option within forensic mental health contexts. These outcomes were compared with previous research findings. Limitations of the study, clinical implications and ideas for future research have been discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14789949.2019.1614650

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although most qualitative studies of adults mentioned values as a helpful component in treatment, contact with the present moment was highlighted and experienced as the most critical and significant core process.

    “Although most qualitative studies of adults mentioned values as a helpful component in treatment, contact with the present moment was highlighted and experienced as the most critical and significant core process (Bacon et al., 2014; Davies et al., 2019; Bahattab and AlHadi, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, B. E., Morgan, S., John-Evans, H., & Deere, E.
Affiliations
  • Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB)
  • Glanrhyd Hospital (GB)
  • Trainee Clinical Psychologist South Wales School of Clinical Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Davies, Bronwen E.
Venue
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
594-613
ISSN
  • 1478-9949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9957
OpenAlex
W2943927911
Cited by
9
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
forensic mental health, service user experiences, psychosis, recovery, insight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review