From traditional cognitive–behavioural therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a mixed-methods study of staff experiences of change
Open accessAbstract
Health care organizations, both large and small, frequently undergo processes of change. In fact, if health care organizations are to improve over time, they must change; this includes pain services. The purpose of the present study was to examine a process of change in treatment model within a specialty interdisciplinary pain service in the UK. This change entailed a switch from traditional cognitive–behavioural therapy to a form of cognitive–behavioural therapy called acceptance and commitment therapy. An anonymous online survey, including qualitative and quantitative components, was carried out approximately 15 months after the initial introduction of the new treatment model and methods. Fourteen out of 16 current clinical staff responded to the survey. Three themes emerged in qualitative analyses: positive engagement in change; uncertainty and discomfort; and group cohesion versus discord. Quantitative results from closed questions showed a pattern of uncertainty about the superiority of one model over the other, combined with more positive views on progress reflected, and the experience of personal benefits, from adopting the new model. The psychological flexibility model, the model behind acceptance and commitment therapy, may clarify both processes in patient behaviour and processes of staff experience and skilful treatment delivery. This integration of processes on both sides of treatment delivery may be a strength of acceptance and commitment therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Introducing innovative approaches such as ACT into established health care can cause some anxiety for professional groups.
“However, studies have shown that introducing innovative approaches such as ACT into established health care can cause some anxiety for professional groups.”
From Introducing acceptance and commitment therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: An action research study (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
A prior study identified that those from a non-psychology background may need to be offered more support and direct training in how to select, modify or refine methods to fit with the shifting treatment approach.
“They identified that those from a non-psychology background may need to be offered more support and direct training in how to select, modify or refine methods to fit with the shifting treatment approach.”
From Introducing acceptance and commitment therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: An action research study (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
A prior study reported that there was some tension between different disciplines and that while nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy can directly promote psychological flexibility and operate in an ACT environment, the methods for doing this are far less well mapped out than for psychologists.
“They reported that there was some tension between the different disciplines and that while nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy can directly promote psychological flexibility and operate in an ACT environment, the methods for doing this are far less well mapped out than”
From Introducing acceptance and commitment therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: An action research study (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
A qualitative study of staff from different clinical backgrounds about their experiences of changing to ACT found that uncertainty and discomfort were an emergent theme.
“a qualitative study of staff from a number of different clinical backgrounds about their experiences of changing to ACT found that uncertainty and discomfort were an emergent theme. 12”
From Introducing acceptance and commitment therapy to a physiotherapy-led pain rehabilitation programme: An action research study (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers
Ruhl, K. (2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1319 · Cited by 10,514 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · see citing works
(1999) · Cited by 5,934 · see citing works
Smith, J. A. (1996) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449608400256 · Cited by 2,380 · see citing works
Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research
Cassell, C. M., & Gillian Symon, B. (2004) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446280119 · Cited by 1,836 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy.
Hayes, S. C., & Lillis, J. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/17335-000 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161646 · Cited by 1,105 · see citing works
Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Gatchel, R. J., & Okifuji, A. (2006) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.08.005 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches
King, N. (1992) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00487.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Lappalainen, R., Lehtonen, T., Skarp, E., Taubert, E., Ojanen, M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445506298436 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Promoting innovation: A change study
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., & Wall, T. D. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317905x68240 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
van Dam, K. (2005) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317904x23745 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
The Impact of Cognitive Flexibility on Resistance to Organizational Change
Chung, S., Su, Y.-F., & Su, S.-W. (2012) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.5.735 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Acceptance and related processes in adjustment to chronic pain
Thompson, M., & McCracken, L. M. (2011) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-010-0170-2 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationLuoma, J. B., & Vilardaga, J. P. (2013) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2012.701662 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Group membership and staff turnover affect outcomes in group CBT for persistent pain
de C. Williams, A. C., & Potts, H. W. W. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.011 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
CBT for Culture Change: Formulating Teams to Improve Patient Care
Newman‐Taylor, K., & Sambrook, S. (2012) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465812000069 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [18]18. Lappalainen R, Lehtonen T, Skarp E, et al. The impact of CBT and ACT models using psychology trainee therapists. Behav Modif 2007; 31: 488–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Godfrey, E., Wileman, V., Galea Holmes, M., McCracken, L. M., Norton, S., Moss-Morris, R., Noonan, S., Barcellona, M., & Critchley, D. (2020) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2019.05.012 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationBarker, K. L., Heelas, L., & Toye, F. (2016) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/2049463715587117 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Godfrey, E. L., Holmes, M. G., Wileman, V., McCracken, L. M., Norton, S., Moss-Morris, R. E., Pallet, J., Sanders, D., Barcellona, M. G., & Critchley, D. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011548 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationHarrison, A. M., Scott, W., Johns, L., Morris, E. M. J., & McCracken, L. M. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw310 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationWardley, M. N., Flaxman, P. E., Willig, C., & Gillanders, D. T. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314557977 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Current and Future Trends in Psychology and Chronic Pain: Time for a Change?
McCracken, L. M., & Montesinos, F. (2014) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt.13.76 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationHolmes, M. G., Wileman, V., McCracken, L. M., Critchley, D., March, M. K., Norton, S., Moss-Morris, R. E., Noonan, S., Barcellona, M. G., & Godfrey, E. L. (2020) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2020.12.004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationDavies, B. E., Morgan, S., John-Evans, H., & Deere, E. (2019) · The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology · doi:10.1080/14789949.2019.1614650 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Johnson, L. M., Elsegood, K. J., & Lennox, C. (2018) · Advances in Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1108/add-07-2018-0009 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Scott-Dempster, C., Toyé, F., & Barker, K. L. (2017) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2017.1357149 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Montesinos, F., Páez, M. B., McCracken, L. M., Rodríguez‐Rey, R., Núñez-Nagy, S., González, C., Díaz-Meco, R., & Hernando, A. (2019) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/2049463719884589 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationGismervik, S. Ø., Fimland, M. S., Fors, E. A., Johnsen, R., & Rise, M. B. (2018) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1490824 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Psychological approaches to chronic pain management: where are we coming from and where might we go?
McCracken, L. M. (2017) · Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor · doi:10.20986/resed.2017.3606/2017 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationHuish, E., Donnelly, O., & Marks, E. M. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcp-2022-0030 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barker, E., & McCracken, L. M.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- McCracken, Lance M
- Venue
- British Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 98-106
- ISSN
- 2049-4637 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-4645
- PMC
- PMC4590121
- OpenAlex
- W2131284940
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- British Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, organizational change, employee experience, psychological flexibility, group cohesion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review