Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality

Open access
Haug, Peder·2017·Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Abstract

The key issue discussed in the article is the main challenges in developing inclusive education. Most European countries have acknowledged inclusive education as a means to secure equal educational rights for all persons. However, the definitions and implementations of inclusive education vary immensely. They are discussed in relation to a narrow and a broad definition of inclusive education, distinguishing between a horizontal and a vertical dimension of the concept. The article also goes into students’ learning outcomes in inclusive education as well as teacher competencies for inclusive pedagogy. No country has yet succeeded in constructing a school system that lives up to the ideals and intentions of inclusion, as defined by different international organizations. Placement seems to be the most frequent criterion of inclusive education, to avoid segregation. The quality of teaching and learning processes in inclusive education has lower priority.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1080/03054985.2015.1006614 · doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1006614
  2. Booth T, 1996, Exclusion from School: Inter-Professional Issues for Policy and Practice, 21
  3. Cara M., 2013, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 90
  4. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, 2014, Five Key Messages for Inclusive Education. Putting Theory into Practice
  5. European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, 2014, Vocational Education and Training-Summary of Country Information.
  6. Hansen O., 2013, Paideia, 8
  7. Hanushek E. A., 2014, What Lies Ahead for America’s Children and Their Schools, 23
  8. 10.4324/9780203465233_chapter_6 · doi:10.4324/9780203465233_chapter_6
  9. 10.1080/15017410903385052 · doi:10.1080/15017410903385052
  10. 10.1080/13632752.2014.883788 · doi:10.1080/13632752.2014.883788
  11. Johnsen B, 2000, Et historisk perspektiv på idéene om en skole for alle. Rekonstruksjon av sentrale tanker og tradisjoner med basis i Erik Pontoppidans og Ole Vigs pedagogiske tekster
  12. Kiuppis F., 2011, Norsk pedagogisk tidskrift, 95, 91, 10.18261/ISSN1504-2987-2011-02-02 · doi:10.18261/issn1504-2987-2011-02-02
  13. Kreitz-Sandberg S, 2015, Rights of Children in the Nordic Welfare States, 145
  14. Mostert M. P., 2008, Challenging the Refusal of Reasoning in Special Education
  15. OECD, 1999, Inclusive Education at Work
  16. Warnock M, 2005, Special Educational Needs: A New Look. IMPACT no. 11, A Series of Policy Discussions

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Haug, P.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
206-217
ISSN
  • 1501-7419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3011
OpenAlex
W2510531420
Cited by
630
References
41
FWCI
45.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Norwegian Council of Research (218326)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778
The paper
Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.