Cited by 50Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Associations Between Marital Conflict and Adolescent Conflict Appraisals, Stress Physiology, and Mental Health

Open access
Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G., Lunkenheimer, Erika S., Dumitrache, Adina·2017·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine conflict appraisals and diurnal cortisol production as mediators of the robust association between marital conflict and adolescent adjustment problems. Parents reported their marital conflict and were observed engaging in a marital conflict discussion; they also reported adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Adolescents (n = 105, 52% female, 10-17 years of age) appraised their parents' marital conflict and reported their internalizing and externalizing behaviors. After the laboratory visit, adolescents provided four saliva samples on each of 2 consecutive days to assess diurnal cortisol production. More-negative marital conflict predicted more self-blame for parental conflict, which in turn predicted less robust decreases in cortisol across the day. Further, this flattened cortisol production pattern mediated the relationship between greater self-blame for parental conflict and adolescents' elevated internalizing behaviors. Feeling responsible for parental conflict appears to be particularly damaging in terms of physiological regulation and adjustment, and may therefore be a particularly useful intervention target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2015.1046179

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appraising conflict as threatening to self or family and/or feeling self-blame is particularly risky for children's adjustment and regulation.

    “Appraising conflict as threatening to the self or family, and/or feeling self-blame for interparental conflict is particularly risky for children in terms of adjustment and regulation”

    From Mindfulness Interventions to Reduce Impact of Interparental Conflict on Adolescents. (2020) · cites this paper as Lucas-Thompson et al. 2015

    The Discussion links threat appraisals to internalizing problems and self-blame to both internalizing and externalizing problems. It also reports that self-blame predicted flattened cortisol slopes, but threat appraisals were not related to the diurnal cortisol measure studied. Thus the adjustment claim is supported, while the regulation claim is supported for self-blame, not threat. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Frequent, intense, poorly resolved interparental conflict raises adolescents' risk for internalizing and externalizing problems and for stress physiological dysregulation.

    “Exposure to frequent, intense, and poorly resolved interparental conflict puts adolescents at risk for problems in many domains, including internalizing and externalizing problems, and stress physiological dysfunction.”

    From Mindfulness Interventions to Reduce Impact of Interparental Conflict on Adolescents. (2020) · cites this paper as Lucas-Thompson et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hostinar C. E., 2013, Handbook of psychology, 121
  2. Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user's guide

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lucas-Thompson, R. G., Lunkenheimer, E. S., & Dumitrache, A.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2015-07-02
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
379-393
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2124799280
Cited by
50
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD068170)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
marital conflict, self-blame, diurnal cortisol, stress physiology, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, adolescent adjustment, mediation, parental conflict
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Internal-External Control, Male, Marriage, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Saliva, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review