Cited by 900Stress Responses and CortisolChild Abuse and TraumaAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Low cortisol and a flattening of expected daytime rhythm: Potential indices of risk in human development

GUNNAR, MEGAN R., VAZQUEZ, DELIA M.·2001·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

Since the work of Hans Selye, stress has been associated with increased activity of the limbic–hypothalamic– pituitary–adrenocortical (LHPA) axis. Recently, a number of studies in adults have shown that this neuroendocrine axis may be hyporesponsive in a number of stress-related states. Termed hypocortisolism, the paradoxical suppression of the LHPA axis under conditions of trauma and prolonged stress presently challenges basic concepts in stress research. Adverse conditions that produce elevated cortisol levels early in life are hypothesized to contribute to the development of hypocortisolism in adulthood. However, as reviewed in this paper, hypocortisolism also may be a common phenomenon early in human childhood. Although preliminary at this point, the ubiquity of these findings is striking. We argue that developmental studies are needed that help explicate the origins of low cortisol and to determine whether the development of hypocortisolism is, in fact, preceded by periods of frequent or chronic activation of the LHPA axis. We also argue that developmental researchers who incorporate measures of salivary cortisol into their studies of at-risk populations need to be aware of the hypocortisolism phenomenon. Lower than expected cortisol values should not necessarily be relegated to the file drawer because they contradict the central dogma that stress must be associated with elevations in cortisol. Lastly, we note that evidence of low cortisol under adverse early life conditions in humans adds to the importance of understanding the implications of hypocortisolism for health and development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579401003066

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GUNNAR, M. R., & VAZQUEZ, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2001-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
515-538
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2011044338
Cited by
900
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 68
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2k02mh000946-06)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HC/CK47431)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH60766, R03MH060766, MH-00946)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M-01RR00042, M01RR000042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenal insufficiency, cortisol, diurnal cortisol rhythm, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress, childhood adversity, child development, salivary cortisol, developmental risk, trauma, chronic stress
MeSH terms
Affect, Child, Child Abuse, Psychology, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Limbic System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review