Cited by 11

Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Youth Mental Health: A Commentary on Advantages, Challenges, and Potential Directions

Sherrill, Joel T.·2016·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

This commentary underscores the importance and potential of the research approaches and intervention strategies described in the JCCAP special issue on the Science of Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Child and Adolescent Mental Health for addressing the widely observed heterogeneity in response to even our most promising research-informed interventions. First, the commentary briefly summarizes the advantages of these approaches and highlights how these programs of research are responsive to widely agreed-upon calls for more personalized, prescriptive interventions. Next, the commentary briefly discusses key common challenges and gaps in our knowledge that might be addressed to advance the development, testing, and implementation of adaptive intervention strategies. For example, research to identify robust moderators that might serve as potential tailoring variables for initial assignment and sequencing of interventions, efforts to operationalize surrogate endpoints for early identification of individuals who are unlikely to respond to first-line interventions, and research that helps define what constitutes an adequate exposure (i.e., dose) or response threshold (e.g., response that suggests the need to intensify, switch, or augment interventions) would inform decision rules for adaptive algorithms. The commentary concludes with a discussion of potential strategies and current initiatives that might ultimately help facilitate research on more targeted, prescriptive approaches…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2016.1169539

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A SMART design offers a considerable practical advantage over more traditional trial designs, in that it addresses simultaneously several research questions and study hypotheses relevant to each decision stage, as well as their interaction representing the sequencing of interventions.

    “A SMART design offers a considerable practical advantage over more traditional trial designs, in that it addresses simultaneously several research questions and study hypotheses relevant to each decision stage, as well as their interaction representing the sequencing of interventions [64].”
  • Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines.

    “Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines [64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherrill, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
522-527
ISSN
  • 1537-4416
  • 1537-4424
Cited by
11
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review