Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Youth Mental Health: A Commentary on Advantages, Challenges, and Potential Directions
Abstract
This commentary underscores the importance and potential of the research approaches and intervention strategies described in the JCCAP special issue on the Science of Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Child and Adolescent Mental Health for addressing the widely observed heterogeneity in response to even our most promising research-informed interventions. First, the commentary briefly summarizes the advantages of these approaches and highlights how these programs of research are responsive to widely agreed-upon calls for more personalized, prescriptive interventions. Next, the commentary briefly discusses key common challenges and gaps in our knowledge that might be addressed to advance the development, testing, and implementation of adaptive intervention strategies. For example, research to identify robust moderators that might serve as potential tailoring variables for initial assignment and sequencing of interventions, efforts to operationalize surrogate endpoints for early identification of individuals who are unlikely to respond to first-line interventions, and research that helps define what constitutes an adequate exposure (i.e., dose) or response threshold (e.g., response that suggests the need to intensify, switch, or augment interventions) would inform decision rules for adaptive algorithms. The commentary concludes with a discussion of potential strategies and current initiatives that might ultimately help facilitate research on more targeted, prescriptive approaches…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A SMART design offers a considerable practical advantage over more traditional trial designs, in that it addresses simultaneously several research questions and study hypotheses relevant to each decision stage, as well as their interaction representing the sequencing of interventions.
“A SMART design offers a considerable practical advantage over more traditional trial designs, in that it addresses simultaneously several research questions and study hypotheses relevant to each decision stage, as well as their interaction representing the sequencing of interventions [64].”
From A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines.
“Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines [64].”
From A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sertraline, or a Combination in Childhood Anxiety
Walkup, J. T., Albano, A. M., Piacentini, J., Birmaher, B., Compton, S. N., Sherrill, J. T., Ginsburg, G. S., Rynn, M. A., McCracken, J., Waslick, B., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0804633 · Cited by 1,442 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence-based psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Pelham, W. E., & Fabiano, G. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701818681 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Almirall, D., Nahum-Shani, I., Sherwood, N. E., & Murphy, S. A. (2014) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0265-0 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Greiner, A. R., Gnagy, E. M., Pelham, W. E., Coxe, S., Verley, J., Bhatia, I., Hart, K., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1105138 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Compton, S. N., Peris, T. S., Almirall, D., Birmaher, B., Sherrill, J., Kendall, P. C., March, J. S., Gosch, E. A., Ginsburg, G. S., Rynn, M. A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035458 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pistorello, J., Jobes, D. A., Compton, S. N., Locey, N. S., Walloch, J. C., Gallop, R., Au, J. S., Noose, S. K., Young, M., Johnson, J., et al. (2018) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2017.1392915 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Peterson, B. S., West, A. E., Weisz, J. R., Mack, W. J., Kipke, M. D., Findling, R. L., Mittman, B. S., Bansal, R., Piantadosi, S., Takata, G., et al. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03314-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pintello, D. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13037 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sherrill, J. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 522-527
- ISSN
- 1537-4416
- 1537-4424
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review