Cited by 170Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule–Autism Addendum: Reliability and Validity in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Kerns, Connor Morrow, Renno, Patricia, Kendall, Philip C., Wood, Jeffrey J., Storch, Eric A.·2017·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Assessing anxiety in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is inherently challenging due to overlapping (e.g., social avoidance) and ambiguous symptoms (e.g., fears of change). An ASD addendum to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Child/Parent, Parent Version (ADIS/ASA) was developed to provide a systematic approach for differentiating traditional anxiety disorders from symptoms of ASD and more ambiguous, ASD-related anxiety symptoms. Interrater reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were examined in a sample of 69 youth with ASD (8-13 years, 75% male, IQ = 68-143) seeking treatment for anxiety. The parents of participants completed the ADIS/ASA and a battery of behavioral measures. A second rater independently observed and scored recordings of the original interviews. Findings suggest reliable measurement of comorbid (intraclass correlation = 0.85-0.98, κ = 0.67-0.91) as well as ambiguous anxiety-like symptoms (intraclass correlation = 0.87-95, κ = 0.77-0.90) in children with ASD. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported for the traditional anxiety symptoms on the ADIS/ASA, whereas convergent and discriminant validity were partially supported for the ambiguous anxiety-like symptoms. Results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the ADIS/ASA as a measure of traditional anxiety categories in youth with ASD, with partial support for the validity of the ambiguous anxiety-like categories. Unlike other measures, the ADIS/ASA differentiates comorbid anxiety disorders from overlapping and ambiguous anxiety-like symptoms in ASD, allowing for more precise measurement and clinical conceptualization. Ambiguous anxiety-like symptoms appear phenomenologically distinct from comorbid anxiety disorders and may reflect either symptoms of ASD or a novel variant of anxiety in ASD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2016.1233501

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kanner L., 1943, Pathology, 217
  2. Kerns C. M., 2015, The Autism Spectrum Addendum to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule
  3. Lord C., 2012, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS-2
  4. Schopler E., 2002, The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Kerns, C. M., Renno, P., Kendall, P. C., Wood, J. J., & Storch, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Kerns, Connor Morrow
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
88-100
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2560791324
Cited by
170
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD080097)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, anxiety disorders, anxiety comorbidity, social avoidance, inter-rater reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review