Cited by 15Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Mechanical and Biological characterization of A Porous Poly‐L‐Lactic Acid‐Co‐ϵ‐Caprolactone scaffold for Tissue Engineering

Vaquette, Cédryck, Frochot, Céline, Rahouadj, Rachid, Muller, Sylvaine, Wang, Xiong·2008·Soft Materials

Abstract

This article presents a method for making highly porous biodegradable scaffold that may ultimately be used for tissue engineering. Poly(L‐lactic‐co‐ϵ‐caprolactone) acid (70∶30) (PLCL) scaffold was produced using the solvent casting/leaching out method, which entails dissolving the polymer and adding a porogen that is then leached out by immersing the scaffold in distillated water. Tensile tests were performed for three types of scaffolds, namely pre‐wetted, dried, and UV‐irradiated scaffolds and their mechanical properties were measured. The pre‐wetted PLCL scaffold possessed a modulus of elasticity 0.92±0.09 MPa, a tensile strength of 0.12±0.03 MPa and an ultimate strain of 23±5.3%. No significant differences in the modulus elasticity, tensile strength, nor ultimate strain were found between the pre‐wetted, dried, and UV irradiated scaffolds. The PLCL scaffold was seeded by human fibroblasts in order to evaluate its biocompatibility by Alamar blue® assays. After 10 days of culture, the scaffolds showed good biocompatibility and allowed cell proliferation. However, the fibroblasts stayed essentially at the surface. This study shows the possibility to use the PLCL scaffold in dynamic mechanical conditions for tissue engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15394450801887109

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCL tensile strength is closely related to the ratio of L-lactic acid to caprolactone, and higher L-lactide contents enable PLCL to exhibit higher tensile strength.

    “In PLCL, the tensile strength is closely related to the ratio of L-lactic acid to caprolactone. The rigid structure of L-lactide monomers enables PLCL to exhibit higher tensile strength at higher L-lactide contents [52, 53].”
  • PLCL tensile strength is typically between 20 and 60 MPa, depending on its molecular weight and proportion.

    “Typically, the tensile strength is between 20 and 60 MPa, depending on its molecular weight and proportion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaquette, C., Frochot, C., Rahouadj, R., Muller, S., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Vaquette, Cédryck
Venue
Soft Materials
Published
2008-03-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
25-33
ISSN
  • 1539-445X (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4468
OpenAlex
W2112784448
Cited by
15
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soft Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
porogen leaching, tensile properties, UV irradiation, human fibroblasts, cell seeding, biocompatibility, cell proliferation, tissue engineering scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review