Cited by 7Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in Treatment Effects of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Based on Sleep Reactivity: A Preliminary Study

Park, Kyunga, Kim, Goeun, Lee, Jiyun, Suh, Sooyeon·2023·Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sleep reactivity is the trait-like degree to which stress disrupts sleep, resulting in difficulty falling and staying asleep. Although previous studies have suggested that individuals who have high sleep reactivity may be resistant to cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) effects, there have been no studies that have investigated this empirically. This study explored differential treatment responses in CBT-I based on sleep reactivity levels. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Participants for this study were nineteen insomnia patients who met DSM-5 criteria for insomnia disorder. All participants received four weekly sessions of structured cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Individuals completed the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Korean version of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised (K-CESD-R), Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST), Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale-16 (DBAS-16), the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events (DISE) and a sleep diary. Participants were classified into two groups based on sleep reactivity level (high and low sleep reactivity). RESULT: Following treatment, significant changes were found for ISI, K-CESD-R, DBAS-16 and FIRST scores, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency, number of awakenings, sleep quality and feeling refreshed upon awakening in both groups. Improvements in sleep efficiency was lower in the high sleep reactivity group compared to the low sleep reactivity group. No differences in ISI, K-CESD-R, DBAS-16 scores, and stress event frequency during the treatment duration were found between groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that sleep reactivity level may be an important factor that affects treatment outcome of CBT-I. Furthermore, the results may suggest that individual response to stress events are more important than the stressor itself.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15402002.2022.2093880

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1177/1073191102091006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3390/brainsci7040041 · DOI
  3. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s40675-017-0096-x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30464-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/sleep/26.8.1029 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.17241/smr.2018.00304 · DOI
  9. Crönlein T., 2018, Sleep Medicine
  10. 10.1093/sleep/27.2.285 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.5665/SLEEP.1234 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.5665/sleep.3916 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/sleep/30.2.203 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.024 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/jsr.12172 · DOI
  17. 10.5664/jcsm.6192 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.02.005 · DOI
  19. 10.5665/sleep.6306 · DOI
  20. 10.5665/sleep.5462 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/brainsci7030023 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/10503300902849483 · DOI
  23. Lee S., 2016, Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, 24, 83
  24. 10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT622 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/sleep/22.8.1134 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000030391.09558.A3 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/sleep/30.11.1547 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.09.022 · DOI
  29. 10.5665/sleep.3838 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.5664/jcsm.3270 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Park, K., Kim, G., Lee, J., & Suh, S.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Sungshin University, Seongbuk-gu, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author
Suh, Sooyeon
Venue
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Published
2022-06-27
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
332-343
ISSN
  • 1540-2002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-2010
OpenAlex
W4283582151
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1C1B1008002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, sleep reactivity, treatment response heterogeneity, insomnia, stress and sleep, sleep efficiency, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Sleep, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review