Cited by 48COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Healthcare workers’ burn-out, hopelessness, fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support levels

Open access
Karagöl, Arda, Törenli Kaya, Zulal·2022·The European Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives During the pandemic, all healthcare workers have tried to cope with mental challenges. This study evaluated the healthcare workers' levels of burn-out, hopelessness, fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support, the relation between these factors, and other possible related components.Methods Four hundred and fifty-one HCW (healthcare workers) all across Turkey were included in the study. Sociodemographic information form, Maslach Burn-out Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale were given to the participants. This was a cross-sectional study via various online platforms.Results The participants who were on duty in the COVID-19 clinic, complaining about the low salary or not having enough time for themselves or their own family, had significantly higher scores on three subscales of burn-out scale, and hopelessness scale. Working at governmental hospitals, working at departments containing a high risk of COVID-19 infection, and having a history of COVID-19 infection were found to be significantly associated with emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and hopelessness. Feeling control of your profession and getting social support from others were the two factors that tackle burnout in HCW. Family support is the only support that tackles all 3 subscales of burn-out and hopelessness.Conclusion The findings emphasized that to tackle the burn-out and hopelessness of HCW, it is important for HCW to receive financial compensation for their hard work, to work under improved conditions, and to receive adequate social support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.01.001

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the pandemic, constant exposure to critically ill patients, scarcity of resources, and accumulated fatigue may have contributed to the development of feelings of hopelessness.

    “During the pandemic, constant exposure to critically ill patients, scarcity of resources, and accumulated fatigue may have contributed to the development of feelings of hopelessness (15).”

    From Evolution of burnout syndrome in Spanish healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: psychosocial variables involved (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (page not specified) associates higher hopelessness scores with COVID-19 clinic duty, high-risk departments, excessive workload and insufficient personal time. These findings support a cautious link between demanding pandemic work and hopelessness, but the paper does not specifically identify constant exposure to critically ill patients, resource scarcity or accumulated fatigue as contributors. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Workers experiencing high levels of burnout were more likely to feel hopeless.

    “Research indicates that workers experiencing high levels of burnout were more likely to feel hopeless”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]RL Kemperman, Burnout and alcohol consumption: a meta-analysis [Internet] 2018 [cited 2021 Dec 9]. Available from: https://studenttheses.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/74011 by selecting master thesis download.
  2. [29]Turkish thoracic society press announcement [Internet]. 2021 Feb 2 [Cited 2021 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.toraks.org.tr/site/news/10240.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karagöl, A., & Törenli Kaya, Z.
Affiliations
Başkent University Hospital (TR)
Corresponding author
Karagöl, Arda
Venue
The European Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
200-206
ISSN
0213-6163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206127019
Cited by
47
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
healthcare workers, burnout, hopelessness, fear of COVID-19, perceived social support, COVID-19 pandemic, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, family support, working conditions, public hospitals, professional control, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review