CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Psychological Testing and AssessmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standardised rating scales in Psychiatry: Methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales

Möller, Hans-Jürgen·2009·The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
DOI 10.1080/15622970802264606
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Standardized rating scales are an important tool to improve the assessment of psychopathological symptoms in terms of validity and reliability. Especially observer-rated scales are of primary importance in this respect. Self-rating scales can give a meaningful complementary view to the findings of observer-rated scales. Besides scales covering more or less the whole spectrum of psychopathological symptoms, specialised scales focussing only on symptoms of disorders like schizophrenia or depression were developed. They are widely used, specifically for pragmatic reasons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15622970802264606

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Methodik und Dokumentation in der Psychiatrie, Collegium Internaationale Psychiatriae Scalarum. 1990. Rating Scales for Psychiatry. European Edition. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH.
  2. Baumann U, 1983, Empirische Studien zur Psychopathologie
  3. Bech P, 1981, Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, 295, 1
  4. Beck AT, 1974, Modern problems in pharmacopsychiatry, 7, 151
  5. Beck AT, 1986, Kognitive Therapie der Depression2nd ed
  6. Bentall RP, 1992, Psychologist, 5, 61
  7. Bobon D, 1985, Acta Psychiatr Belg, 85, 5
  8. Deloch E, 1986, G Selecta Bericht, 42, 3068
  9. Derogatis LR, 1973, Psychopharmacol Bull, 9, 13
  10. Derogatis LR., 1977, Manual for the revised version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series
  11. Faltermaier T, 1987, Die Social Interview Schedule (deutschsprachige modifizierte Version)
  12. Fischer G, 1974, Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests
  13. Gebhardt R, 1973, Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr, 112, 459
  14. Goldberg DP, 1972, The detection of psychiatric illness by questionaire
  15. Gutzmann H, 1986, G Selecta Bericht, 42, 3068
  16. Guy W, 1979, The AMDP System
  17. Hamilton M, 1969, Studies of anxiety, 76
  18. Hasemann K. 1971. Verhaltensbeobachtung. In: Heiss R Handbuch der Psychologie. 3rd ed. vol 6. Göttingen: Hogrefe. p 807–836.
  19. Hathaway SR, 1963, Handbuch zur deutschen Ausgabe des MMPI
  20. Hathaway SR, 1989, MMPI-2. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2
  21. Hiller W, 1986, Die IMPS
  22. Huber G, 1976, Psychopathometrie, 2, 61
  23. Kay SR, 1988, Schizophr Bull, 13, 21
  24. Kobak KA, 1999, MD Comput, 16, 64
  25. Laux L, 1981, Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI)
  26. Lienert GA, 1969, Testaufbau und Testanalyse
  27. McEvoy JP, 1994, J Clin Psychiatry (Suppl), 55, 18
  28. McIntyre R, 2002, J Psychiatry Neurosci, 27, 235
  29. Mombour W, 1974, Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr, 219, 331, 10.1007/BF00343604 · DOI
  30. Mombour W, 1973, Nervenarzt, 44, 352
  31. Montgomery SA, 1980, Postgrad Med J, 56, 50
  32. Morosini PL, 2000, Acta Psychiatr Scand, 101, 323, 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2000.tb10933.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. National Institute of Mental Health, 1976, ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, 217
  34. Overall JE, 1972, Applied multivariate analyses
  35. Pfohl B, 1989, Structured interview for DSM-III-R personality (SIDP-R)
  36. Renfordt E, 1983, AMDP-System in pharmacopsychiatry, 125
  37. Sarris V, 1974, Klinische Psychologie. II. Methoden, Ergebnisse und probleme der Forschung, 286
  38. Sass H, 1986, Nervenarzt, 57, 193
  39. Schmidtke A, 1988, Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr, 139, 51
  40. Steinmeyer EM, 1992, J Affect Disord, 25, 53, 10.1016/0165-0327(92)90093-L · DOI
  41. Stieglitz RD, 1994, Psychodiagnostik psychischer Störungen
  42. Troisfontaines B, 1987, Acta Psychiatr Belg, 87, 23
  43. von Zerssen D, 1976, Kllinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (KSbS) aus dem Münchener Psychiatrischen Informationssystem (PSYCHIS München)
  44. von Zerssen D., 1976, Befindlichkeits-Skala
  45. von Zerssen D., 1976, Beschwerden-Liste
  46. von Zerssen D., 1976, Paranoid-Depressivitäts-Skalen
  47. von Zerssen D, 1994, Psychodiagnostik psychischer Störungen, 216
  48. Welner J, 1972, Depressive Zustände, 209
  49. White J, 1984, J Clin Psychiatry, 45, 260
  50. Wittchen HU, 1997, Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
  51. Wittchen HU, 1991, Z Klin Psychol, 20, 136
  52. Wittchen HU, 1997, Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID)
  53. Zimmerman M, 2004, J Nerv Ment Dis, 192, 595, 10.1097/01.nmd.0000138226.22761.39 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 107

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Möller, H.-J.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Möller, Hans-Jürgen
ORCID
Möller, Hans-Jürgen
Venue
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
6-26
ISSN
  • 1562-2975 (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-1412
DOI
10.1080/15622970802264606
OpenAlex
W2007300324
Cited by
107
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Eisai
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
self-rating scale, validity, reliability statistics, schizophrenia, depression, psychiatric assessment
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychiatry, Psychometrics, Reference Standards, Schizophrenia, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review