Cited by 59Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPain Management and Treatment

Graded In Vivo Exposure Treatment for Fear-Avoidant Pain Patients with Functional Disability: A Case Study

Linton, Steven J., Overmeer, Thomas, Janson, Markus, Vlaeyen, Johan W. S., de Jong, Jeroen R.·2002·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

This single-subject study attempts to replicate the effects of in vivo exposure for pain patients with functional difficulties. Fear-avoidance is a clear risk factor related to dysfunction associated with back pain. Nevertheless, until recently treatment had not dealt specifically with the avoidance behaviour. The treatment of other phobias suggests that in vivo exposure might be an efficient means of treatment. As patients do not normally conceptualize their problem as a phobia, there have been numerous problems in developing exposure techniques. Recently, however, an in vivo exposure technique for pain-related functional problems has been described. The study described here replicates the method: 2 male chronic back pain patients with functional problems and high scores on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia volunteered to participate. Hierarchies were established with the help of a "fear thermometer" and the patients were subsequently provided with 8 sessions of in vivo exposure. The results replicated the original study and showed substantial improvements for both patients as they increased their function and decreased their fear. Thus, the findings are extended to another setting: patients and therapists. It is concluded that these results warrant further investigation in larger, controlled trials. Key words: back pain, activity training exposure, fear-avoidance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506070252959481

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar effects have been reported in 2 case studies each involving 2 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

    “Similar effects have been reported in 2 case studies each involving 2 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linton, S. J., Overmeer, T., Janson, M., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & de Jong, J. R.
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2002-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
49-58
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2076930563
Cited by
59
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
fear avoidance, chronic back pain, functional disability, kinesiophobia, avoidance behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review