Cited by 95Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Using acceptance and commitment therapy in the rehabilitation of an adolescent female with chronic pain: A case example.

Wicksell, Rikard K., Dahl, JoAnne, Magnusson, Bo, Olsson, Gunnar L.·2005·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1077-7229(05)80069-0

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wicksell, R. K., Dahl, J., Magnusson, B., & Olsson, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
415-423
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146452604
Cited by
95
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic pain, adolescents, musculoskeletal pain, pain avoidance, behavioral medicine, psychological intervention, rehabilitation, functional capacity, school attendance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review