The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire—Reliability and Factor Structure: A Swedish Version
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to assess the Swedish version of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), which was originally created by Baer et al. (2006). The aim of Study 1 was to examine the psychometric properties of the FFMQ using data from 495 individuals. Quantitative and qualitative analyses resulted in a reduction of the scale by 10 items. Psychometric properties, including internal consistency of the revised instrument, were examined. The Swedish FFMQ provides results comparable to those obtained by Baer. Cronbach's alphas were high for all the facets. The Swedish FFMQ appears to be a potentially useful tool in measuring mindfulness among Swedish participants. The aim of Study 2 was to test the suggested hierarchical five-factor solution and construct validity, using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Similar to findings for the English version of the FFMQ, the CFA showed that the Observing facet was not a significant part of an overall self-reported mindfulness structure in a Swedish population with little meditation experience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The measures have been translated and back translated for previous studies [33, 36–38], except the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) that was translated for this study by a group of researchers with long experience in acceptance-, mindfulness-, and value-based interventions.”
From Psychological inflexibility explains distress in parents whose children have chronic conditions (2018) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“In addition, the Swedish version of the FFMQ has 10 less items and a different factor structure than the English version [40].”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, various short forms of the FFMQ have been proposed [18], [20], [22], [26], indicating that its scale composition may need improvement.”
In the citing paper
“However, statistically, it may not be ruled out that age, or cohort effects, were fully or partially responsible for the observed associations of meditation practice and mindfulness [22].”
In the citing paper
“Previous research suggests increases of mindfulness with practice [2], [22], [25], [59], [60].”
Citations
Cites
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511 · cited 23×
“Because the original FFMQ (Baer et al., 2006) was based on a sample of undergraduate students (mean age 1⁄4 20.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
Cary, G. L. (1994) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.1.155 · Cited by 6,299
(2005) · Cited by 6,097
(1999) · Cited by 5,934
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Byrne B. M., 2010, Structural equation modeling with AMOS—Basic concepts, application and programming
- Frodi-Lundgren, A. (2008). Assessing the Swedish translation of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire, Unpublished thesis, University of Gothenburg
- Linehan M., 1994, Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy, 73
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eriksson, T., Germundsjö, L., Åström, E., & Rönnlund, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02340 · Cited by 225
Hou, J., Wong, S. Y.-S., Lo, H. H.-M., Mak, W. W.-S., & Ma, H. S.-W. (2014) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113485121 · Cited by 215
“Moreover, it has been translated into different languages and validated in various populations (Deng, Liu, Rodriguez, & Xia, 2011; Lilja et al., 2011; Veehof, Ten Klooster, Taal, Westerhof, & Bohlmeijer, 2011).”
BackgroundGender Differences in Self-Compassion: Examining the Role of Gender Role Orientation
Yarnell, L. M., Neff, K. D., Davidson, O., & Mullarkey, M. C. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-1066-1 · Cited by 196
Lilja, J. L., Lundh, L.-G., Josefsson, T., & Falkenström, F. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0111-8 · Cited by 167
Self-citationMindfulness and its efficacy for psychological and biological responses in women with breast cancer
Kenne Sarenmalm, E., Mårtensson, L. B., Andersson, B. A., Karlsson, P., & Bergh, I. (2017) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1052 · Cited by 160
“Mindfulness was measured using the 29- item short form Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ–Swedish version), consisting of five key facets of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity to inner experience [59, 60].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilja, J. L., Frodi-Lundgren, A., Hanse, J. J., Josefsson, T., Lundh, L.-G., Sköld, C., Hansen, E., & Broberg, A. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Halmstad University (SE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lilja, Josefine L.
- Venue
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 291-303
- ISSN
- 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2316
- OpenAlex
- W2064472532
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- mindfulness, Swedish translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, meditation experience, cross-cultural adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sweden, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
