Cited by 100Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge

Open access
Rusznyak, Lee, Walton, Elizabeth·2011·Education as Change

Abstract

Lesson planning for student teachers is often regarded in technical terms, merely as the means to ensure effective classroom performance. This approach limits the possibilities that the process of lesson planning offers to the development of professional competence among student teachers. In particular, student teachers need to begin to develop their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), the capacity to make pedagogical choices that are logically derived from content and contextual knowledge. This article reports on a Lesson Planning Guideline which is used to scaffold the construction of student teachers’ PCK individually by requiring them to consider the constituent parts of PCK individually and in relation to one another during the planning process. This guideline was developed in response to perceived limitations of existing guidelines used in our institution and found in texts for student teachers. Called a “Rationale for lesson design” the Guideline does not attempt to simplify the planning process, but rather enables students systematically to access the complexities inherent in effective lesson preparation. By requiring students to articulate their content knowledge and narrate their pedagogical reasoning in some detail, the Guideline enables students not only to teach with confidence but also to construct PCK.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16823206.2011.619141

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When lesson planning requires little more than a link to curriculum and written lesson steps, opportunities for students to justify their teaching choices are missed.

    “For example, when lesson planning requires little more than a link to curriculum and written lesson steps, opportunities for students to justify their teaching choices are missed (Rusznyak & Walton, 2011).”
  • Lesson planning requirements serve as a significant framework that potentially guides the way pre-service teachers rationalise the design of their lessons.

    “They serve as a significant framework that potentially guides the way that preservice teachers rationalise the design of their lessons (Rusznyak & Walton, 2011).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1080/09500690802187041 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/09500690801998885 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bransford J., 2000, How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school
  4. Carter K., 1993, Educational Researcher, 22, 5, 10.3102/0013189X022001005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Calderhead J., 1997, Understanding teacher education
  6. Criticos C., 2009, Getting practical: about classroom-based teaching for the National Curriculum Statement
  7. Darling-Hammond L., 2006, Powerful teacher education: lessons from exemplary programs
  8. Darling-Hammond L., 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 169
  9. Darling-Hammond L., 1997, The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work
  10. De Beer J., 2010, Becoming a teacher, 76
  11. 10.1080/00098650903507460 · DOI
  12. Du Plessis E., 2010, Becoming a teacher, 53
  13. Du Toit E., 2010, Help! I'm a student teacher! Skills development for teaching practice, 149
  14. Fuller F., 1975, Teacher education: 74th yearbook of the National Society for Study in Education, 25
  15. Gall M., 2011, Clinical supervision and teacher development
  16. Gess-Newsome J., 1999, Examining pedagogical content knowledge, 3
  17. Grossman P.L., 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
  18. Hammerness K., 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do, 358
  19. 10.4324/9780203464885 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00220270500363620 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00035-8 · DOI
  22. Kagan D.M., 1992, Review of Educational Research, 62, 129, 10.3102/00346543062002129 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kemmis S., 2008, Enabling praxis: challenges for education, 15, 10.1163/9789087903275 · DOI
  24. Killen R., 2010, Teaching strategies for quality teaching and learning
  25. 10.1080/00220270010000204 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/09500690801998885 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Morrow W., 2007, Learning to teach in South Africa
  28. 10.1080/09500690802186993 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7 · DOI
  30. Richardson V., 2005, Constructivist teacher education, 10.4324/9780203973684 · DOI
  31. Rusznyak L., 2010, Retrieving teaching: critical issues in curriculum, pedagogy and learning, 117
  32. 10.1080/16823200903234794 · DOI
  33. Rusznyak , L. 2008 . Learning to teach: developmental patterns of student teaching . Unpublished doctoral thesis , University of the Witwatersrand , Johannesburg .
  34. Shalaway L., 1997, Learning to teach…not just for beginners
  35. Shalem Y., 2010, Retrieving teaching: critical issues in curriculum, pedagogy and learning, 87
  36. Shalem Y., 2010, Retrieving teaching: critical issues in curriculum, pedagogy and learning, 12
  37. Shulman L.S., 1987, AAHE Bulletin, 40, 5
  38. Tyler R.W., 1949, Basic principles of curriculum and instruction
  39. Walton E., 2010, Inclusivity in the classroom
  40. Wiggins G., 2005, Understanding by design

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Walton, Elizabeth
Venue
Education as Change
Published
2011-12
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
271-285
ISSN
  • 1682-3206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-9417
OpenAlex
W2168403020
Cited by
100
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Education as Change (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
lesson planning, pre-service teachers, pedagogical content knowledge, scaffolding, professional competence, pedagogical reasoning, content knowledge, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review