Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 911

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1

Lazar, Michelle M.·2007·Critical Discourse Studies

Abstract

This article outlines a ‘feminist critical discourse analysis’ at the nexus of critical discourse analysis and feminist studies, with the aim of advancing rich and nuanced analyses of the complex workings of power and ideology in discourse in sustaining hierarchically gendered social orders. This is especially pertinent in the present time; it is recognized that operations of gender ideology and institutionalized power asymmetries between (and among) groups of women and men are complexly intertwined with other social identities and are variable across cultures. Gender ideology and power asymmetries in late modern societies also have become increasingly more subtle and, at the same time, as a result of backlash against feminism, have re-emerged with a new blatancy. The article offers a rationale for highlighting a feminist perspective in CDA, and proposes five key principles for a feminist discourse praxis. In concluding, a brief analysis and discussion of some data on postfeminism is provided, illustrating some of the current concerns in feminist critical discourse analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17405900701464816

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Benhabib S., 1987, Feminism as critique, 77
  2. 10.1177/0957926500011003001 · doi:10.1177/0957926500011003001
  3. Caldas-Coulthard C. R., 1995, Language and gender: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 226
  4. Christie C., 2000, Gender and language: Towards a feminist pragmatics, 10.1515/9780585468013 · doi:10.1515/9780585468013
  5. Connell R. W., 1995, Masculinities
  6. Foucault M., 1977, Discipline and punish
  7. Fraser N., 1990, Feminism/postmodernism, 19
  8. Gill R., 2003, Feminist Media Studies, 3, 100
  9. Hirschmann N. J., 1999, Feminism, identity and difference, 27
  10. Hodge R., 1988, Social semiotics
  11. Lazar M. M., 1999, Reading culture: Textual practices in Singapore, 145
  12. Mills S., 1995, Feminist stylistics
  13. Saeed J., 1997, Semantics
  14. Scollon R., 2001, Methods of critical discourse analysis, 139
  15. Segal L., 1999, Why feminism? Gender, psychology, politics
  16. Spender D., 1981, Men's studies modified: The impact of feminism on the academic disciplines
  17. Spender D., 1985, Man made language
  18. Van Dijk T. A., 1991, The Semiotic Review of Books, 2, 1
  19. 10.1177/0957926594005003001 · doi:10.1177/0957926594005003001
  20. Walter N., 1999, The new feminism
  21. West C., 1997, Discourse as social interaction, 2, 119
  22. Wilkinson S., 1995, Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives, 1
  23. Williamson J., 2003, The Guardian Unlimited, 1
  24. Wolf N., 1993, Fire with fire: The new female power and how to use it

Cited by

See all 911

Metadata

Authors
Lazar, M. M.
Venue
Critical Discourse Studies
Published
2007-08
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
141-164
ISSN
  • 1740-5904 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-5912
OpenAlex
W2142919159
Cited by
911
References
91
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17405900701464816
The paper
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.