The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1
Abstract
This article outlines a ‘feminist critical discourse analysis’ at the nexus of critical discourse analysis and feminist studies, with the aim of advancing rich and nuanced analyses of the complex workings of power and ideology in discourse in sustaining hierarchically gendered social orders. This is especially pertinent in the present time; it is recognized that operations of gender ideology and institutionalized power asymmetries between (and among) groups of women and men are complexly intertwined with other social identities and are variable across cultures. Gender ideology and power asymmetries in late modern societies also have become increasingly more subtle and, at the same time, as a result of backlash against feminism, have re-emerged with a new blatancy. The article offers a rationale for highlighting a feminist perspective in CDA, and proposes five key principles for a feminist discourse praxis. In concluding, a brief analysis and discussion of some data on postfeminism is provided, illustrating some of the current concerns in feminist critical discourse analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1991.33 · Cited by 29,379
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,894
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813085 · Cited by 10,438
Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex
Butler, J. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203828274 · Cited by 10,349
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,964
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Benhabib S., 1987, Feminism as critique, 77
- 10.1177/0957926500011003001 · doi:10.1177/0957926500011003001
- Caldas-Coulthard C. R., 1995, Language and gender: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 226
- Christie C., 2000, Gender and language: Towards a feminist pragmatics, 10.1515/9780585468013 · doi:10.1515/9780585468013
- Connell R. W., 1995, Masculinities
- Foucault M., 1977, Discipline and punish
- Fraser N., 1990, Feminism/postmodernism, 19
- Gill R., 2003, Feminist Media Studies, 3, 100
- Hirschmann N. J., 1999, Feminism, identity and difference, 27
- Hodge R., 1988, Social semiotics
- Lazar M. M., 1999, Reading culture: Textual practices in Singapore, 145
- Mills S., 1995, Feminist stylistics
- Saeed J., 1997, Semantics
- Scollon R., 2001, Methods of critical discourse analysis, 139
- Segal L., 1999, Why feminism? Gender, psychology, politics
- Spender D., 1981, Men's studies modified: The impact of feminism on the academic disciplines
- Spender D., 1985, Man made language
- Van Dijk T. A., 1991, The Semiotic Review of Books, 2, 1
- 10.1177/0957926594005003001 · doi:10.1177/0957926594005003001
- Walter N., 1999, The new feminism
- West C., 1997, Discourse as social interaction, 2, 119
- Wilkinson S., 1995, Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives, 1
- Williamson J., 2003, The Guardian Unlimited, 1
- Wolf N., 1993, Fire with fire: The new female power and how to use it
Cited by
Drinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassment
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 · Cited by 495
Politics and porn: how news media characterizes problems presented by deepfakes
Gosse, C., & Burkell, J. (2020) · Critical Studies in Media Communication · doi:10.1080/15295036.2020.1832697 · Cited by 148
Setyono, B. (2018) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-018-9526-2 · Cited by 54
Safe from “harm”: The governance of violence by platforms
DeCook, J. R., Cotter, K., Kanthawala, S., & Foyle, K. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.290 · Cited by 46
(2012) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazar, M. M.
- Venue
- Critical Discourse Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-164
- ISSN
- 1740-5904 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-5912
- OpenAlex
- W2142919159
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17405900701464816
- The paper
- Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.