Cited by 42Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingEmpathy and Medical EducationCancer survivorship and care

Patient's expression of hope and illness narratives in three neurological conditions: a meta-ethnography

Open access
Soundy, Andrew, Smith, Brett, Dawes, Helen, Pall, Hardev, Gimbrere, Katrina, Ramsay, Jill·2013·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Hope has been identified as a key attribute required for neurological rehabilitation. Expressions of hope form the basis for patient narratives within this context. The purpose of this study was to use patient's experience of hope as a way of understanding narrative types. This study looks at three different neurological conditions: spinal cord injury, stroke and multiple sclerosis. Using a meta-ethnographical method, eight narrative macrostructures were identified by three groups of hope: (1) hope as a dichotomy, (2) hope as a paradox and (3) transcendence. The discussion provides further details of these groups and establishes how therapeutic emplotment may influence and guide narratives within neurological rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2011.568856

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expression of hope in individuals with chronic neurological conditions is directly associated with the adoption of hope or coping strategies which enable access to generalized hopes.

    “The expression of hope (Soundy et al., 2013) in individuals with chronic neurological conditions is directly associated with the adoption of hope or coping strategies which enable access to generalized hopes.”
  • The self-initiated response includes some form of transcendence, such as positive cognitive reappraisal, benefit finding, or post-traumatic growth.

    “(b) Some form of transcendence (Soundy et al., 2013), for instance, positive cognitive reappraisal or benefit finding of one's situation (Nowlan et al., 2014), or post traumatic growth (Tedeschi and Calhoun, 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soundy, A., Smith, B., Dawes, H., Pall, H., Gimbrere, K., & Ramsay, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Soundy, Andrew
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2011-04-08
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
177-201
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2019544536
Cited by
42
References
62
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
hope, illness narratives, patient experience, neurorehabilitation, spinal cord injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, narrative macrostructure, transcendence, paradox

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review