Cited by 82Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health via Writing

Gratitude in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures

Open access
Shin, Lilian J., Armenta, Christina N., Kamble, Shanmukh V., Chang, Sheng-Ling, Wu, Hsiang-Yi, Lyubomirsky, Sonja·2020·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

Although research suggests that Eastern, collectivist cultures do not benefit as much from practicing gratitude compared to Western, individualist cultures, the reasons for these differences remain unclear. In a single time-point randomized controlled intervention, participants in India (N = 431), Taiwan (N = 112), and the U.S. (N = 307) were randomly assigned either to write a gratitude letter to someone who had done a kind act for them, to write a gratitude letter to themselves for a kind act they had done for another person, or to complete a neutral control writing activity. Immediately after completing their assigned writing activity, participants completed measures of state gratitude, elevation, and emotions (guilt, indebtedness, embarrassment, positive affect, and negative affect). U.S. (but not Indian and Taiwanese) participants who expressed gratitude reported greater state gratitude relative to controls. Although not explicitly grateful, however, Indian and Taiwanese participants who wrote gratitude letters reported higher elevation (and Indian participants, reduced negative affect) compared to control participants. Finally, compared to control participants, Taiwanese (but not U.S.) participants felt less guilty when writing a gratitude letter to themselves. The results provide new insights for why expressing gratitude may be a less effective happiness-promoting activity in collectivist cultures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2020.1789699

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nelson, S. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016). Gratitude. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mental Health (2nd ed., Vol. 2.,, pp. 277-280). Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, L. J., Armenta, C. N., Kamble, S. V., Chang, S.-L., Wu, H.-Y., & Lyubomirsky, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Karnatak University (IN)
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Shin, Lilian J.
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2020-07-07
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
598-604
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W3040509159
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
gratitude, gratitude letter, collectivist culture, individualistic culture, cross-cultural comparison, state gratitude, altitude, guilt, negative affect, positive affect, happiness promotion, writing intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review