Cited by 289Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMental Health via Writing

Gratitude and hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Vietnam war veterans

Kashdan, Todd B., Uswatte, Gitendra, Julian, Terri·2006·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Little information exists on the contribution of psychological strengths to well-being in persons with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Data from other populations suggest that gratitude, defined as the positive experience of thankfulness for being the recipient of personal benefits, may have salutary effects on everyday functioning. We investigated whether dispositional gratitude predicted daily hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in combat veterans with and without PTSD. We also examined associations between daily gratitude and daily well-being across time. Veterans with PTSD, compared to those without PTSD, exhibited significantly lower dispositional gratitude; no differences were found on daily gratitude. Dispositional gratitude predicted greater daily positive affect, percentage of pleasant days over the assessment period, daily intrinsically motivating activity, and daily self-esteem over and above effects attributable to PTSD severity and dispositional negative and positive affect in the PTSD group but not the non-PTSD group. Daily gratitude was uniquely associated with each dimension of daily well-being in both groups. Although preliminary, these results provide support for the further investigation of gratitude in trauma survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2005.01.005

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online interventions for diabetes self-management and depression are feasible and have shown some efficacy for depression symptoms and some health outcomes.

    “Online interventions for diabetes self-management and depression are feasible and have shown some efficacy [28]|[29] at improving symptoms of depression and some health outcomes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., Uswatte, G., & Julian, T.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
177-199
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995134009
Cited by
289
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
gratitude, post-traumatic stress disorder, combat veterans, Vietnam War veterans, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, positive affect, self-esteem, psychological strengths, daily well-being, trauma survivors
MeSH terms
Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Vietnam Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review