Cited by 497Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies

Elevation Leads to Altruistic Behavior

Open access
Schnall, Simone, Roper, Jean, Fessler, Daniel M.T.·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Feelings of elevation, elicited by witnessing another person perform a good deed, have been hypothesized to motivate a desire to help others. However, despite growing interest in the determinants of prosocial behavior, there is only limited evidence that elevation leads to increases in altruistic behavior. In two experiments, we tested the relationship between elevation and helping behavior. Prior to measuring helping behavior, we measured elevation among participants in an elevation-inducing condition and control conditions in order to determine whether witnessing altruistic behavior elicited elevation. In Experiment 1, participants experiencing elevation were more likely to volunteer for a subsequent unpaid study than were participants in a neutral state. In Experiment 2, participants experiencing elevation spent approximately twice as long helping the experimenter with a tedious task as participants experiencing mirth or a neutral emotional state. Further, feelings of elevation, but not feelings of amusement or happiness, predicted the amount of helping. Together, these results provide evidence that witnessing another person’s altruistic behavior elicits elevation, a discrete emotion that, in turn, leads to tangible increases in altruism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797609359882

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnall, S., Roper, J., & Fessler, D. M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Schnall, Simone
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-01-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
315-320
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2170007928
Cited by
497
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 14
FWCI
27.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0518835)
  • Association for Psychological Science
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-061-25-0119-A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Keywords
altitude, altruism, prosocial behavior, helping behavior, discrete emotions, mirth, amusements, happiness, volunteering, emotional contagion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Altruism, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Morals, Motivation, Social Environment, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review