Cited by 511Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth, psychology, and well-being

The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving ( CIT ) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving ( BIT )

Su, Rong, Tay, Louis, Diener, Ed·2014·Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Abstract

In this article we present the development and validation of two new measures of psychological well‐being: the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving ( CIT ) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving ( BIT ). These measures were developed with two specific goals in mind: (1) to measure a broad range of psychological well‐being constructs and represent a holistic view of positive functioning; and (2) to predict important health outcomes that are useful for researchers and health practitioners. The CIT includes 18 subscales with 54 items in total, covering a broad range of well‐being components. The BIT has 10 items in total and can serve as an indicator of psychological well‐being and a brief screening tool of mental health. The new measures were evaluated in five samples of a total of 3,191 US participants with diverse demographics. The CIT and BIT had excellent psychometric properties and exhibited convergent validity with existing measures of psychological well‐being and discriminant validity with measures of ill‐being. Both measures contributed over and above existing measures of psychology well‐being in predicting a variety of health outcomes, including self‐reported and objective health status, physical functioning, and health behaviors. In addition, we showed the relative importance of thriving compared to ill‐being for health outcomes and the benefits of assessing individuals' positive functioning beyond ill‐being. Potential uses of the new measures are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aphw.12027

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a general non-clinical sample, the CIT subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.71-0.96), good test-retest reliability (r = 0.57-0.83), convergent validity with other measures of psychological well-being, divergent validity with measures of ill-being, and good predictive validity for health and quality of life.

    “In a general non-clinical sample, the CIT subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.71–0.96), good test–retest reliability (r = 0.57–0.83), convergent validity with other measures of psychological well-being, divergent validity with measures of ill-being, and good predictive validity for health and quality of life [67].”
  • The Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) is a comprehensive measure of psychological well-being designed for research and for in-depth assessment of well-being in health settings such as psychiatric and clinical practices.

    “The CIT [67] is a comprehensive measure of psychological well-being designed for use in research purposes and for in-depth assessment of well-being in health settings, such as psychiatric and clinical practices.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Su, Rong
Venue
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-12
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
251-279
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W2153810892
Cited by
511
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (63597)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
thriving, psychological well-being, scale development, psychometric validation, mental health screening, health outcomes, physical function, health behavior, positive functioning, ill-being
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review