Cited by 31Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Screening and brief interventions for substance use in emergency departments in the Western Cape province of South Africa: views of health care professionals

Sorsdahl, Katherine, Myers, Bronwyn, Ward, Cathy, Matzopoulos, Richard, Mtukushe, Bulelwa, Nicol, Andrew, Stein, Dan J.·2014·International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion

Abstract

As part of the formative phase of screening and brief interventions (SBIs) for substance use amongst patients presenting for emergency services in South Africa, the present study explored health care providers' attitudes and perceptions towards SBI. Twenty-four health care providers working in two 24-hour emergency departments (EDs) were interviewed using an open-ended semi-structured interview schedule designed to identify factors that may hinder or promote the implementation of SBI for substance use in these settings. All respondents felt that screening patients for substance use in EDs is possible; however, they emphasised the need for an additional staff member dedicated to these activities. Secondly, they felt this dedicated individual should meet certain educational criteria and be from a specific socio-demographic background in order to increase the likelihood of intervention uptake. Thirdly, a number of patient- and clinic-level barriers were revealed that could potentially hinder the successful implementation of SBIs in EDs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17457300.2013.811267

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to BI implementation in an emergency department setting included aggressive patients, lack of private space within the emergency department, and severely injured patients.

    “Barriers to BI implementation in an emergency department setting included: aggressive patients, lack of private space within the emergency department, severely injured patients [107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorsdahl, K., Myers, B., Ward, C., Matzopoulos, R., Mtukushe, B., Nicol, A., & Stein, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
Corresponding author
Sorsdahl, Katherine
Venue
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
Published
2013-07-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
236-243
ISSN
  • 1745-7300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-7319
OpenAlex
W2081115474
Cited by
31
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
screening and brief intervention, substance use, emergency department, clinician attitudes, implementation barriers, employee training, Western Cape
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Personnel, Hospital, South Africa, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review