Cited by 8Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Brief behaviour change counselling in non-communicable diseases in Mangochi, Southern Malawi: a hypothetical acceptability study

Open access
Lutala, Prosper, Muula, Adamson·2022·Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Abstract

Introduction: Brief behaviour change counselling (BBCC) approaches have shown some potential in reversing and/or decreasing the effects of behavioural risk factors (harmful alcohol, smoking, physical inactivity and unhealthy diets). However, BBCC is new in Malawi. Thus, we explored the acceptability of brief behaviour change counselling using 5 As and a guiding style from motivational interviewing (BBCC + 5 As + GS) among health providers, policy-makers and patients living with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in the Mangochi district located in Malawi. Methods: An exploratory qualitative cross-sectional study used purposive sampling to select 44 respondents. We conducted group discussions with five focus groups that included patients. We also carried out nine key-informant interviews with healthcare providers and policy-makers. Data were managed and organized with Atlas.ti. cloud and analysed using the thematic framework approach. Findings: Several themes, categories, and their subcategories emerged from the interviews. Participants perceived the introduction and delivery of BBCC + 5As + GS in Mangochi as smooth. However, they predicted a few challenges such as time and space to conduct the intervention, cultural bottlenecks caused by low education level, age differences between healthcare providers and patients, low provider- to- patient ratio and high provider turnover. For this method to be adopted, a simplified format is deemed necessary to improve effectiveness with patients. This technique can only be sustained if training opportunities are provided and if positive testimonies are given by beneficiaries. Incorporation of a continuous quality improvement cycle targeting challenges must be part of the intervention. Participants perceived that BBCC will contribute to developing the listening ability of healthcare providers. This would help in providing personalized and cost-effective care relevant to Mangochi. The participants also perceived that BBCC + 5As + GS will be affordable, credible and useful. Conclusion: We found a high acceptability rate of BBCC among stakeholders in NCDs clinics in Mangochi. There are a number of areas where BBCC + 5As + GS could be improved to increase the acceptability. Accordingly, a study of feasibility and preliminary efficacy is warranted to determine other prerequisites for the implementation of a large-scale trial using this BBCC+ 5 As + GS, and to fully understand the implementation requirements of a full trial in Mangochi.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40814-022-01032-0

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to implementation from providers' perspectives included time and space.

    “Barriers to implementation from providers’ perspectives included time and space [47,49], competing work priorities [48], and lack of referral pathways ([71] (Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [20]Olukokun T, Ayodapo A, Omosanya O, Elegbede O, Ibrahim A. Lifestyle counselling and blood pressure control among hypertensive in a primary care clinic; a quasi-experimental study. J Res Basic Clin Sci. 2019;1:53-60.
  2. [28]Polit D, Beck C. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  3. [31]Huberman A Miles M Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (editors). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials 2000 Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications Inc.
  4. [38]Peters DH Adam T Alonge O Implementation research: what it is and how to do it Br J Sports Med 2013 6753 1 7 24659611
  5. [56]Grol RW Eccles M Improving Patient Care 2013 Somerset Wiley
  6. [60]Hofstede G Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations 2001 2 Thousand Oaks Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutala, P., & Muula, A.
Affiliations
University of Malawi (MW)
Corresponding author
Lutala, Prosper
Venue
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2022-03-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
69-69
ISSN
2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220907093
Cited by
8
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • College of Medicine University of Malawi Small grants from dean of research and postgraduates studies
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5U24HL136791-03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
motivational interviewing, non-communicable diseases, acceptability, implementation barriers, health education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review