Cited by 64Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

Short article: Age and synchrony effects in visuospatial working memory

Rowe, Gillian, Hasher, Lynn, Turcotte, Josée·2009·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Younger and older adults were administered a computerized version of the Corsi Block visuospatial working memory (VSWM) span task at either their peak or off-peak time of day and in either a high-interference (ascending order of administration, starting with short lists first) or low-interference (descending order, starting with longest lists first) format. Young adults’ span scores were highest in the ascending format. By contrast, older adults performed better in the low-interference format, replicating findings with verbal memory span studies. Although both age groups benefited from being tested at their peak time, the advantage was far greater for older adults, but only in the low-interference format; their scores on the high-interference format were not helped by peak-time testing. These findings are consistent with the suggestion that young adults’ performance on span tasks is influenced by practice and strategies, but the performance of older adults is heavily influenced by interference—which is best controlled at peak times of day. Our findings suggest that both time of testing and interference play critical roles in determining age differences in VSWM span, and both a reduction in interference and peak-time testing may be necessary to optimize older adults’ performance and to maximize the reduction in age differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470210902834852

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, G., Hasher, L., & Turcotte, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Laurentian University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Rowe, Gillian
  • Hasher, Lynn
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2009-10
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
1873-1880
ISSN
  • 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
OpenAlex
W2082167144
Cited by
64
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R37 AGO 4306)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
visuospatial working memory, age differences, time of day, interference, practice effects, cognitive aging, older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Serial Learning, Space Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review