Cited by 150Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

RNAi knockdown of oxytocin receptor in the nucleus accumbens inhibits social attachment and parental care in monogamous female prairie voles

Open access
Keebaugh, Alaine C., Barrett, Catherine E., Laprairie, Jamie L., Jenkins, Jasmine J., Young, Larry J.·2015·Social Neuroscience

Abstract

Oxytocin modulates many aspects of social cognition and behaviors, including maternal nurturing, social recognition and bonding. Natural variation in oxytocin receptor (OXTR) density in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is associated with variation in alloparental behavior, and artificially enhancing OXTR expression in the NAcc enhances alloparental behavior and pair bonding in socially monogamous prairie voles. Furthermore, infusion of an OXTR antagonist into the NAcc inhibits alloparental behavior and partner preference formation. However, antagonists can promiscuously interact with other neuropeptide receptors. To directly examine the role of OXTR signaling in social bonding, we used RNA interference to selectively knockdown, but not eliminate, OXTR in the NAcc of female prairie voles and examined the impact on social behaviors. Using an adeno-associated viral vector expressing a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Oxtr mRNA, we reduced accumbal OXTR density in female prairie voles from juvenile age through adulthood. Females receiving the shRNA vector displayed a significant reduction in alloparental behavior and disrupted partner preference formation. These are the first direct demonstrations that OXTR plays a critical role in alloparental behavior and adult social attachment, and suggest that natural variation in OXTR expression in this region alone can create variation in social behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470919.2015.1040893

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin, dopamine, and vasopressin regulate neural circuits responsible for generating bonds in animals and humans.

    “Here, we provide an overview of the roles of oxytocin, dopamine, and vasopressin in regulating neural circuits responsible for generating bonds in animals and humans alike.”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links oxytocin signaling in the nucleus accumbens and dopamine D2 signaling in the striatum to pair-bond formation in prairie voles. It also discusses oxytocin-related social behavior in humans, but does not establish that all three substances—including vasopressin—regulate bond-forming neural circuits in both animals and humans. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Viral knockdown of OXTRs within the NAc of voles disrupts partner preference formation and alloparental behavior; increasing OXTR expression in the NAc facilitates pair bonding and maternal care.

    “Additionally, viral knockdown of OXTRs within the NAc of voles disrupts partner preference formation and alloparental behavior; however, pair bonding and maternal care are facilitated when OXTR expression in the NAc is increased, suggesting a direct role of NAc OXTRs in driving affiliative behavior [15,140].”

    From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that viral OXTR knockdown in the nucleus accumbens reduced alloparental behavior and disrupted partner preference formation. The Introduction reports that increased OXTR expression facilitated partner preference, and, when administered to juveniles, increased alloparental behavior. It does not establish increased maternal care, which is distinct from care of others’ young. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In contrast to nonmonogamous species, prairie voles have high densities of oxytocin receptors in nucleus accumbens, and oxytocin signaling in the accumbens during mating is essential for partner preference formation.

    “In contrast to nonmonogamous species, prairie voles have high densities of oxytocin receptors in nucleus accumbens, and oxytocin signaling in the accumbens during mating is essential for partner preference formation”

    From Oxytocin, Neural Plasticity, and Social Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Keebaugh et al. 2015

    The Introduction states that prairie voles have higher nucleus accumbens oxytocin-receptor density than nonmonogamous vole species and that an accumbens receptor antagonist prevents mating-induced partner preferences. The Results show that receptor knockdown eliminated partner preference in females that had mated. Neither finding establishes that signaling specifically during mating is essential; the Methods also note that partner preferences can form without mating. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increasing OXTR density in the nucleus accumbens using viral-vector mediated gene transfer facilitates partner preference formation.

    “Increasing OXTR density in the NAcc using viral-vector mediated gene transfer facilitates partner preference formation, while decreasing OXTR density in the same region using RNA interference inhibits such bonding (37–39).”
  • Decreasing OXTR density in the nucleus accumbens using RNA interference inhibits partner preference formation.

    “Increasing OXTR density in the NAcc using viral-vector mediated gene transfer facilitates partner preference formation, while decreasing OXTR density in the same region using RNA interference inhibits such bonding (37–39).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 150

Authors
Keebaugh, A. C., Barrett, C. E., Laprairie, J. L., Jenkins, J. J., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Spelman College (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Larry J.
Venue
Social Neuroscience
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0927
OpenAlex
W2094583910
Cited by
150
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7
FWCI
30.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (NIH RO1MH096983)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
oxytocin receptor, nucleus accumbens, Microtus ochrogaster, social attachment, parental care, pair bonding, mate preferences, social monogamy, RNAi knockdown, adeno-associated virus vectors, shRNA, female social behavior
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Autoradiography, Arvicolinae, Female, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Nucleus Accumbens, Object Attachment, Pair Bond, Parents, RNA, Messenger, Transduction, Genetic, Transfection, Receptors, Oxytocin, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Green Fluorescent Proteins, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review