Cited by 79Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The performance and psychological effects of goal setting in sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Open access
Williamson, Ollie, Swann, Christian, Bennett, Kyle J.M., Bird, Matthew D., Goddard, Scott G., Schweickle, Matthew J., Jackman, Patricia C.·2024·International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

Goal setting is widely applied in sport. Whereas existing reviews have addressed the performance effects of goal setting, less is known about the concurrent psychological and psychophysiological effects. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that synthesised the effects of goal setting on task performance and various psychological and psychophysiological outcomes in sport. Searches returned 17,841 articles, with 27 meeting eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis of the performance effects and a narrative synthesis of the psychological and psychophysiological effects were undertaken. Process goals had the largest effect on performance (d = 1.36) compared to performance goals (d = 0.44) and outcome goals (d = 0.09). No significant difference in performance was found between specific (d = 0.37) and non-specific goals (d = 0.72). Process goals also had large effects on self-efficacy (d = 1.11), whereas studies guided by self-regulation theory (k = 5) produced the greatest performance enhancements (d = 1.53). It was rarely possible to draw conclusions regarding the effects of goal setting on psychological/psychophysiological outcomes due to a lack of cross study evidence. Nevertheless, these findings provide important insights to guide research and practice on the use of goal setting to enhance performance and psychological/psychophysiological outcomes in sport.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1750984x.2022.2116723

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Process goals are specific and can increase self-efficacy due to increased perception of control, and may have a greater impact on performance than performance and outcome goals.

    “Process goals are specific and can increase self-efficacy due to increased perception of control, and may have a greater impact on performance than performance and outcome goals (Williamson et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, O., Swann, C., Bennett, K. J. M., Bird, M. D., Goddard, S. G., Schweickle, M. J., & Jackman, P. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Ollie
Venue
International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2022-09-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
1050-1078
ISSN
  • 1750-984X (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9858
OpenAlex
W4294376124
Cited by
79
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Southern Cross University and the University of Lincoln (125001 2801)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
goal setting, athletic performance, process goals, performance goals, outcome goals, self-efficacy, self-regulation theory, psychophysiological effects, psychological impact, task performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review