The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variations of salivary cortisol in dogs exposed to different cognitive and physical activities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The results on working and resting salivary cortisol found no AAI-related increase.”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“The authors stated that AAAs can be considered as low-intensity exercises, while dogs provide high psychological support to recipients.”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Significantly higher pre-session cortisol levels may be associated with anticipation stress or arousal during transportation to the facility, but a causal relationship could not be inferred [15].”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Research outcomes indicating that working salivary cortisol concentrations are similar to baseline measurements gathered on non-working days [13,14,15,20,22] parallel previous data from Glenk et al. [25,26], Ng et al. [27] and Koda et al. [28].”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“in three recent studies [15,18,24] dogs participated in sessions between 70 and 90 min [34].”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00122.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00357630 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00145-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.domaniend.2010.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.04.003 · DOI
- Colussi A, 2016, Veterinaria, 30, 3
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.09.010 · DOI
- 10.2460/ajvr.68.1.107 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13028-016-0204-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jab.2014.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0086362 · DOI
- 10.1080/10888705.2014.856241 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jveb.2009.09.027 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcla.21929 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.05.073 · DOI
- 10.1079/ECP200446 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10023-6 · DOI
- 10.4142/jvs.2016.17.2.153 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.08.027 · DOI
- 10.1080/02640414.2015.1068440 · DOI
- 10.2460/ajvr.71.10.1207 · DOI
- 10.1111/jvim.12046 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature
Glenk, L. M., & Foltin, S. (2021) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci8100226 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Colussi, A., Stefanon, B., Adorini, C., & Sandri, M.
- Affiliations
- Dipartimento di Scienze AgroAlimentari, Ambientali e Animali – DI4A, University of Udine, Udine, Italy;
- DVM, Ambulatorio Veterinario ‘Chiara Adorini’, Udine, Italy
- ORCID
- Stefanon, Bruno
- Venue
- Italian Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1030-1037
- ISSN
- 1828-051X
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
