The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use
Open accessAbstract
Digital divide research is now focused on the so-called second-level divide, which concerns Internet “usage” divides. This article suggests that while the first-level divide was associated with sociodemographic factors, the second-level divide is associated with factors such as motivations and Internet skills. It then illustrates an example of the second-level digital divide—the democratic divide. The democratic divide concerns the differences between those who actively use the Web for politics and those who do not. Analysis of General Social Survey data shows there is a democratic divide where political Internet users are individuals with high Internet skills and political interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier
Rheingold, H. (1994) · Cited by 5,645
Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3597 · Cited by 5,186
What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters
Brooks, C., Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655098 · Cited by 4,437
Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1165 · Cited by 2,937
The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society
van Dijk, J. (2005) · doi:10.4135/9781452229812 · Cited by 2,243
What Americans know about politics and why it matters
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-0582 · Cited by 2,050
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1633 · Cited by 1,738
Cited by
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12185 · Cited by 594
Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019) · Social Policy & Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12470 · Cited by 229
Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online
Hocevar, K. P., Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.020 · Cited by 188
Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility
Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2019) · Nordicom Review · doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0002 · Cited by 114
Leyva, R. (2017) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439316655738 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, S.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology & Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-02-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-35
- ISSN
- 1933-1681 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-169X
- OpenAlex
- W1987754428
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 32.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19331680903109402
- The paper
- Min, S.-J. (2010). From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903109402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.