Cited by 2,243Information Society and Technology TrendsICT Impact and PoliciesEducational Innovations and Technology

The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society

van Dijk, Jan·2005·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Introduction A Framework to Understand the Digital Divide Motivational Access Material Access Skills Access Usage Access Inequality in the Information Society Inequality in the Network Society The Stakes: Participation or Exclusion Policy Perspective Reference Index

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781452229812

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dijk, J.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2005
OpenAlex
W1873175055
Cited by
2,243
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 179 · 2025: 190 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 154 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 91
FWCI
35.06
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
Keywords
digital divide, information inequality, network society, ICT access, digital skills, internet use, social exclusion, digital inclusion policy, information society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review