Cited by 159LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Stigma and suicide risk among the LGBTQ population: Are anxiety and depression to blame and can connectedness to the LGBTQ community help?

Kaniuka, Andrea, Pugh, Kelley C., Jordan, Megan, Brooks, Byron, Dodd, Julia, Mann, Abbey K., Williams, Stacey L., Hirsch, Jameson K.·2019·Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health

Abstract

LGBTQ individuals may be at risk for suicidal behavior due to perceived stigma and psychopathology. However, protective factors, such as community connectedness, may reduce risk. We examined depression and anxiety as mediators of the linkage between perceived stigma and suicidal behavior, and the moderating role of LGBTQ community connectedness. Among our sample of LGBTQ persons (N = 496), psychopathology mediated the association between perceived stigma and suicidal behavior. Connectedness moderated the relation between perceived stigma and depression, and between perceived stigma and suicidal behavior in the anxiety model. Therapeutically addressing stigma and promoting LGBTQ community connectedness may reduce risk for suicidal behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19359705.2018.1560385

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2020 survey of more than 3000 patients treated with telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic and a separate survey of more than 100 mental health clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that both patients and clinicians were supportive of telepsychiatry, were satisfied with the quality of care, and would consider using this modality in the future.

    “A 2020 survey of more than 3000 patients treated with telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic 66 and a separate survey of more than 100 mental health clinicians 67 during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that both patients and clinicians were supportive of telepsychiatry, were satisfied with the quality of care, and would consider using this modality in the future.”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaniuka, A., Pugh, K. C., Jordan, M., Brooks, B., Dodd, J., Mann, A. K., Williams, S. L., & Hirsch, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hirsch, Jameson K.
Venue
Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health
Published
2019-03-08
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
205-220
ISSN
  • 1935-9705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9713
OpenAlex
W2920879513
Cited by
159
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2
FWCI
20.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
perceived stigma, suicidal behavior, LGBTQ+ people, depression, anxiety, community ties, protective factors, mediation, moderation, suicide risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review