Comparative Use of Shallow and Deepwater Habitats by Juvenile Pacific Salmon in the Columbia River Estuary Prior to Ocean Entry
Open accessAbstract
The degree to which fine-scale habitat use by salmonid species and stocks varies within habitat types such as estuaries is not fully resolved. We sampled shallow shoreline and deeper main-stem channel habitats in the Columbia River estuary over 3 years to compare salmon species composition, migration timing, density, size, and production type (hatchery or natural). Results indicated a high degree of spatial heterogeneity in habitat occupancy by the five salmonid species that are native to the basin. Salmonid communities at two channel habitat sites were much more similar to each other than to the community at a shoreline site. Salmonids sampled at the shoreline site were primarily subyearling Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha and Chum Salmon O. keta and yearling Coho Salmon O. kisutch, with few other salmonids present. In contrast, channel habitat contained a higher diversity of salmon species, with samples representing all species of anadromous salmonids, including Sockeye Salmon O. nerka and steelhead O. mykiss. Salmonids in deeper channel habitat were generally larger than salmonids found along the shore, and the proportion of hatchery-origin salmon was also higher in deep channel habitats. On a per-area basis, we also found much higher densities of salmon along the shoreline than in channel habitats. For Chinook Salmon, habitat use also differed by genetic stock of origin: upper-river stocks primarily used deeper channels, while lower-river populations used both channel and shoreline areas. We concluded that sampling at both habitat types is required to fully encompass the migration patterns of all salmon evolutionarily significant units in the Columbia River basin. These spatial and temporal variations in salmon timing and density have ramifications for feeding, growth, and competitive interactions. This study provides information that is relevant for conservation efforts targeting specific fish populations and efforts to evaluate the potential impacts of in-water activities in the Columbia River estuary. Received May 12, 2016; accepted August 19, 2016
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SWHA is important to the survival of juvenile salmonids migrating seaward, because they use this habitat to rest, feed, and undergo smoltification.
“SWHA is important to the survival of juvenile salmonids migrating seaward, because they use this habitat to rest, feed, and undergo smoltification (Johnson et al. 2015;Roegner et al. 2016;Sather et al. 2016).”
From Shallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System (2024) · cites this paper as Roegner et al. 2016
The Discussion (page unavailable) describes shallow estuarine habitat as nursery or refuge habitat for small juvenile salmonids, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) describe shallow wetlands and shorelines as sources of insect prey. These passages support refuge and food benefits, but the paper does not establish that salmonids use this habitat to rest or undergo smoltification, or directly demonstrate a survival benefit from those uses. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYearling smolts from interior stocks of steelhead and Chinook Salmon rapidly move through the Columbia River estuary in deep waters of the main channel and are rarely encountered close to shore.
“In the Columbia River basin, yearling smolts from interior stocks of steelhead and Chinook Salmon (those originating above Bonneville Dam, located at river kilometer [rkm] 234; rkm 0 = Columbia River mouth) rapidly move through the Columbia River estuary (CRE; defined as tidal waters below Bonneville Dam) in deep waters of the main channel and are rarely encountered close to shore”
From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in <scp>Main‐Stem</scp> Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Roegner et al. 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0943 · Cited by 1,154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The migration timing patterns we observed in shoreline and channel habitats are generally similar to those reported for other large estuaries within the region (Quinn 2005; Weitkamp et al. 2014).”
ResultRoegner, G. C., Dawley, E. W., Russell, M., Whiting, A., & Teel, D. J. (2010) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t09-082.1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationRoegner, G. C., McNatt, R., Teel, D. J., & Bottom, D. L. (2012) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1080/19425120.2012.675982 · Cited by 36 · cited 15× · see citing works
“Small, naturally produced juvenile subyearling Chinook Salmon that occupy shoreline habitats are primarily fall-run fish originating from lower-river sources (Table 4; Roegner et al. 2012; Teel et al. 2014; Sather et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTeel, D. J., Baker, C., Kuligowski, D. R., Friesen, T. A., & Shields, B. (2009) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t08-084.1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationTeel, D. J., Bottom, D. L., Hinton, S. A., Kuligowski, D. R., McCabe, G. T., McNatt, R., Roegner, G. C., Stamatiou, L. A., & Simenstad, C. A. (2014) · North American Journal of Fisheries Management · doi:10.1080/02755947.2014.901258 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Bayley, P. B., and R. A. Herendeen. 2000. The efficiency of a seine net. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:901-923.
- Bradford, M. J. 1995. Comparative review of Pacific salmon survival rates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:1327-1338.
- Busby, P. J., T. C. Wainwright, G. J. Bryant, L. J. Lierheimer, R. S. Waples, F. W. Waknitz, and I. V. Lagomarsino. 1996. Status review of West Coast steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-27.
- Charles-Dominique, E. 1989. Catch efficiencies of purse and beach seines in Ivory Coast lagoons. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 87:911-921.
- Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in assemblage structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117-143.
- Cross, A. D., D. A. Beauchamp, K. W. Myers, and J. H. Moss. 2008. Early marine growth of Pink Salmon in Prince William Sound and the coastal Gulf of Alaska during years of low and high survival. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:927-939.
- ROEGNER ET AL. 19425120, 2016, 1, Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 6:62-80. · DOI
- Ford, M. J., editor. 2011. Status review update for Pacific salmon and steel- head listed under the Endangered Species Act: Pacific Northwest. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-113.
- Fresh, K. L. 1997. The role of competition and predation in the decline of Pacific salmon and steelhead. Pages 245-275 in D. J. Stouder, P. A. Bisson, and R. J. Naiman, editors. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. Chapman and Hall, New York.
- Hayes, D. B., C. P. Ferreri, and W. W. Taylor. 2013. Active fish capture methods. Pages 193-220 in A. V. Zale, D. L. Parrish, and T. M. Sutton, editors. Fisheries techniques, 3rd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
- Johnson, L., B. Anulacion, M. Arkoosh, O. P. Olson, C. Sloan, S. Y. Sol, J. Spromberg, D. J. Teel, G. Yanagida, and G. Ylitalo. 2013. Persistent organic pollutants in juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Columbia basin: implications for stock recovery. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:21-40.
- Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology, second English edition. Developments in environmental modeling 20. Elsevier Sciences, Amsterdam.
- Miller, J. A., V. L. Butler, C. A. Simenstad, D. H. Backus, and A. J. R. Kent. 2011. Life history variation in upper Columbia River Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): a comparison using modern and ~500-year- old archaeological otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68:603-617.
- Paquet, P. J., T. A. Flagg, A. Appleby, J. Barr, H. L. Blankenship, D. E. Campton, M. R. Delarm, T. T. Evelyn, D. E. Fast, J. C. Gislason, P. Kline, D. J. Maynard, L. E. Mobrand, G. Nandor, P. R. Seidel, and S. Smith. 2011. Hatcheries, conservation, and sustainable fisheries-achieving mul- tiple goals: results of the Hatchery Scientific Review Group's Columbia River basin review. Fisheries 36:547-561.
- Rannala, B., and J. L. Mountain. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:9197-9201.
- Ryan, B. A., S. G. Smith, J. M. Butzerin, and J. W. Ferguson. 2003. Relative vulnerability to avian predation of juvenile salmonids tagged with passive integrated transponders in the Columbia River estuary, 1998-2000. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:275-288.
- Sather, N. K., G. E. Johnson, D. J. Teel, A. J. Storch, J. R. Skalski, and V. I. Cullinan. 2016. Shallow tidal freshwater habitats of the Columbia River: spatial and temporal variability of the fish communities and density, size, and genetic stock composition of juvenile Chinook Salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145:734-753.
- Sebring, S. H., M. C. Carper, R. D. Ledgerwood, B. P. Sandford, G. M. Matthews, and A. F. Evans. 2013. Relative vulnerability of PIT-tagged subyearling fall Chinook Salmon to predation by Caspian terns and dou- ble-crested cormorants in the Columbia River estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:1321-1334.
- Teel, D. J., D. M. Van Doornik, D. R. Kuligowski, and W. S. Grant. 2003. Genetic analysis of juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) off Oregon and Washington reveals few Columbia River wild fish. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 101:640-652.
- Van Doornik, D. M., D. J. Teel, D. R. Kuligowski, C. A. Morgan, and E. Casillas. 2007. Genetic analyses provide insight into the early ocean stock distribution and survival of juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) off the coasts of Washington and Oregon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:220-237.
- Weitkamp, L. A., P. J. Bentley, and M. N. Litz. 2012. Seasonal and interannual variation in juvenile salmonids and associated fish assemblage in open waters of the lower Columbia River estuary, USA. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 110:426-450.
- Weitkamp, L. A., G. Goulette, J. Hawkes, M. O'Malley, and C. Lipsky. 2014. Juvenile salmon in estuaries: comparisons between North American Atlantic and Pacific salmon populations. Review in Fish Biology and Fisheries 24:713-736.
- Williams, R. N., editor. 2006. Return to the river. Elsevier Press, New York. 552
- ROEGNER ET AL. 19425120, 2016, 1, · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weitkamp, L. A., Beckman, B. R., Van Doornik, D. M., Munguia, A., Hunsicker, M., & Journey, M. (2022) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1002/tafs.10376 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationShallow-Water Habitat in the Lower Columbia River Estuary: A Highly Altered System
Templeton, W. J., Jay, D. A., Diefenderfer, H. L., & Talke, S. A. (2024) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-023-01229-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…seasonally reduced SWHA in these reaches coincides with relatively high historical and contemporary abundances of Chinook salmon fry in the LCRE—and in the later months of the freshet, fingerlings (Bottom et al. 2005; Burke 2004; Dawley et al. 1985, 1986; Roegner et al. 2016; Sather et al. 2016).”
A salmon ecosystem conceptual foundation for estuary restoration
Bottom, D. L., Jones, K. K., Borde, A. B., Krueger, K. L., Johnson, G. E., Castro, J. M., & Thom, R. M. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2025-0139 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roegner, G. C., Weitkamp, L. A., & Teel, D. J.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roegner, G. Curtis
- ORCID
- Roegner, G. Curtis
- Venue
- Marine and Coastal Fisheries
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 536-552
- ISSN
- 1942-5120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2546568460
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Marine and Coastal Fisheries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- habitat use, Columbia River estuary, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, chum salmon, coho salmon, sockeye salmon, steelhead, migration timing, evolutionarily significant units, salmon conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review