Cited by 30Fish Ecology and Management StudiesGenetic diversity and population structureMarine and fisheries research

Genetic identification of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River estuary: stock-specific distributions of juveniles in shallow tidal freshwater habitats

Teel, David J., Bottom, Daniel L., Hinton, Susan A., Kuligowski, David R., McCabe, George T., McNatt, Regan, Roegner, G. Curtis, Stamatiou, Lia A. +1 more·2014·North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Abstract

Extensive efforts are underway to restore and conserve nearshore shallow water habitats in the Columbia River estuary with the intent of increasing the estuary's capacity to provide food, refuge, and other crucial ecosystem functions for juvenile salmon. Juvenile Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, including those from the five Evolutionarily Significant Units listed as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, are particularly expected to benefit from the habitat improvements. However, information on the temporal and spatial estuarine distributions of juveniles from specific populations or stocks is lacking and impedes restoration planning for at-risk salmon. We conducted a series of surveys to sample juvenile Chinook Salmon occupying shallow-water habitats with sandy beaches in six hydrogeomorphic reaches across the tidal freshwater portion of the estuary and also at one long-term reference site near the estuary mouth. Sites were sampled bimonthly over 26 months during 2010–2012 to capture seasonal patterns of stock-specific habitat use. Genetic stock identification analyses were conducted on the samples using microsatellite DNA loci and genotypic data representing spawning populations from throughout the Columbia River basin. We identified three tidal freshwater areas that could be distinguished by genetic stock composition. Lower tidal freshwater reaches were dominated by fall-run juveniles from West Cascade tributaries (>70%), upper reaches had…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02755947.2014.901258

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some regional stock group's capture months and sizes suggest a wide range of freshwater tidal occupancy.

    “Similarly, some regional stock group’s capture months and sizes suggest a wide range of freshwater tidal occupancy [16]”
  • Yearling smolts from interior stocks of steelhead and Chinook Salmon rapidly move through the Columbia River estuary in deep waters of the main channel and are rarely encountered close to shore.

    “In the Columbia River basin, yearling smolts from interior stocks of steelhead and Chinook Salmon (those originating above Bonneville Dam, located at river kilometer [rkm] 234; rkm 0 = Columbia River mouth) rapidly move through the Columbia River estuary (CRE; defined as tidal waters below Bonneville Dam) in deep waters of the main channel and are rarely encountered close to shore”
  • Previous studies have warned of potential competition between larger and numerically dominant hatchery salmon and smaller wild salmon in the CRE based on high temporal and spatial overlap in shallow and main-stem habitats.

    “Previous studies have warned of potential competition between larger and numerically dominant hatchery salmon and smaller wild salmon in the CRE based on high temporal and spatial overlap in shallow and main-stem habitats (Bottom et al. 2011(Bottom et al. , 2021;;Teel et al. 2014;Weitkamp et al. 2015).”
  • The stock-specific density of juvenile salmon in restoring wetland habitats is a negative function of the distance of the natal stream from the wetland, with proportionally greater representation from local stocks than distant stocks in LCRE wetlands.

    “there is proportionally greater representation from local stocks than more distant stocks in LCRE wetlands (Roegner et al. 2010, 2012, Teel et al. 2014).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Teel et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teel, D. J., Bottom, D. L., Hinton, S. A., Kuligowski, D. R., McCabe, G. T., McNatt, R., Roegner, G. C., Stamatiou, L. A., & Simenstad, C. A.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Teel, David J.
Venue
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
621-641
ISSN
  • 0275-5947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8675
OpenAlex
W2047298216
Cited by
29
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
North American Journal of Fisheries Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
NOAA Fisheries
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Columbia River estuary, genetic stock identification, sandy beaches, microsatellite genotypes, evolutionarily significant units, hatchery-reared fish, life history types, estuary restoration, seasonal habitat use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review