The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The UCSB Gender Equity Project: Taking Stock of Mentorship, Equity, and Harassment in California Archaeology Through Qualitative Survey Data
Abstract
The University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), Gender Equity Project aims to assess the state of mentorship, equity, and sexual harassment within the California archaeological community. Using the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) as our target population, we administered two surveys in 2016 designed to address those themes. We frame the project in terms of research related to equity issues, outline our primary research questions, and present the demographic patterns from the surveys. Results include gender-based pay discrepancies, preference by women for cultural resource management (CRM) over academic jobs, history of inadequate mentorship for women and underrepresented minorities, and slightly higher rates of sexual harassment reported by women in CRM than in academia. We discuss how the impacts of these issues extend beyond the lives of individuals to affect the nature of the overall discipline.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a strong pattern in North American archaeology of harassment targeting women and LGBTQ2S+ community members.
“There is also a strong pattern in North American archaeology of harassment targeting women and LGBTQ2S+ community members (Hodgetts et al. this issue;Meyers et al. 2015;Meyers et al. 2018;Radde 2018;VanDerwarker et al. 2018)”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as VanDerwarker et al. 2018
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1111/1468-0432.00008 · DOI
- 10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522 · DOI
- 10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0734578X.2015.1113101 · DOI
- Baxter, Jane E., Tracie Mayfield, Jodie O’Gorman, Jane Peterson, and Tammy Stone 2008 Mentoring Strategies for Women in Archaeology: A Report of the 2008 COSWA Working Group. The SAA Archaeological Record 8:15–18.
- Beaudry, Mary C., and Jacquelyn White 1994 Cowgirls with the Blues? A Study of Women’s Publication and the Citation of Women’s Work in Historical Archaeology. In Women in Archaeology, edited by Cheryl Claassen, pp. 138–158. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
- 10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535814 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0102172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z · DOI
- Cusack, Carole M., and Gary Campbell 1993 Women and Postgraduate Education: Problems and Predictions. In Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, edited by Hilary du Cros and Laura J. Smith, pp. 232–236. Occasional Papers in Archaeology, Vol. 23. Canberra Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
- du Cros, Hilary, and Laura J. Smith (editors) 1993 Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Occasional Papers in Archaeology, Vol. 23. Canberra Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
- Gero, Joan 1991 Gender Division of Labor in the Construction of Archaeological Knowledge. In The Archaeology of Gender, edited by Dale Walde and Noreen D. Willows, pp. 96–102. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- 10.1017/aaq.2017.73 · DOI
- 10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535815 · DOI
- 10.2307/2694570 · DOI
- Kahn, Shulamit 1993 Gender Differences in Academic Career Paths of Economists. The American Economic Review 83:52–56.
- 10.1017/aap.2018.23 · DOI
- 10.1037/apl0000022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S104909651000017X · DOI
- 10.1017/S1537592708080572 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00084088 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9033-5 · DOI
- Nelson, Margaret C., Sarah M. Nelson, and Alison Wylie (editors) 1994 Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Archaeological Papers No. 5. American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.
- 10.1111/aman.12929 · DOI
- 10.1080/1947461X.2018.1535816 · DOI
- Safi, Kristin N. (guest editor) 2014 Special Forum on Mentoring. The SAA Archaeological Record 14(4):15–34.
- Stark, Barbara L., Katherine A. Spielmann, Brenda Shears, and Michael Ohnersorgen 1997 The Gender Effect on Editorial Boards and in Academia. SAA Bulletin 15(4):6–9.
- Surface-Evans, Sarah L., and Misty Jackson 2012 Feminine Voices in Archaeology: Promoting Community, Collaboration and Mentoring. The SAA Archaeological Record 12(1):19–22.
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9038-0 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9 · DOI
- Victor, Katherine, and Mary C. Beaudry 1992 Women’s Participation in American Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology: A Comparative Look at the Journals American Antiquity and Historical Archaeology. In Exploring Gender through Archaeology, edited by Cheryl Claassen, pp. 11–22. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
- West, Martha S., and John W. Curtis 2006 AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators 2006. Technical Report, American Association of University Professors, Washington, DC.
- Wright, Rita P. 2003 Gender Matters: A Question of Ethics. In Ethical Issues in Archaeology, edited by Larry J. Zimmerman, Karen D. Vitelli, and Julie Hollowell-Zimmer, pp. 225–238. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
- Zeder, Melinda A. 1997 The American Archaeologist: Results of the 1994 SAA Census. SAA Bulletin 15(2):12–17.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- VanDerwarker, A. M., Brown, K. M., Gonzalez, T., & Radde, H.
- Affiliations
- ,
- Venue
- California Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-158
- ISSN
- 1947-461X
- 1947-4628
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review